CGGOvsNZACETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
NZAC
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) is part of the segment. CGGO's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, NZAC's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. CGGO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.12% for NZAC. CGGO is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2.40B in YTD flows. NZAC performs worse with 9.54% YTD performance, and -$457K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGGO and NZAC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGGO vs NZAC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGGO NZAC | -0.16%+0.98% | -3.56%+0.48% | +14.97%+9.54% | +24.42%+17.83% | +71.12%+64.72% | n/a+55.02% |
| Flows | CGGO NZAC | +$370M- | +$861M- | +$2.40B-$457K | +$3.23B-$5M | +$6.96B-$129M | -+$9M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGGO NZAC | +23.21%+12.91% | +18.77%+12.16% | +16.69%+12.68% | n/a+14.30% |
| Max drawdown | CGGO NZAC | -10.30%-4.71% | -12.83%-9.86% | -17.75%-15.87% | n/a-27.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGGO NZAC | 71d62d | 47d76d | 128d86d | n/a763d |
Trading data
CGGO | NZAC | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.02 | $46.70 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $39.75 | $46.52 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGGO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCGGO | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CGGO | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.02 | $46.70 |
| 1D performance | +0.68% | +0.40% |
| AuM | $11.89 B | $195.89 M |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Characteristics
CGGO | NZAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Capital Group | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned PAB with Dev Market Index |
| N° of holdings | 105 | 614 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 22, 2022 | November 25, 2014 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGGO
USA
51.52%
France
7.26%
Other
41.22%
NZAC
USA
62.82%
Other
37.18%
Sectors
CGGO
Technology
38.79%
Finance
13.32%
Industrials
12.86%
Healthcare
8.94%
Other
26.09%
NZAC
Technology
39.72%
Finance
24.5%
Healthcare
8.96%
Industrials
8.91%
Other
17.91%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGGO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.71%
NZAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.35%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CGGO
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
6.40%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.72%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.38%
Broadcom Inc.
3.37%
SK hynix, Inc.
3.15%
Western Digital Corp.
2.82%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund
2.78%
ASML Holding NV
2.53%
Microsoft Corp.
1.88%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.87%
Aon Plc
1.72%
3i Group Plc
1.63%
Starbucks Corp.
1.57%
Siemens AG
1.50%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.39%
NZAC
NVIDIA Corp.
5.75%
Apple, Inc.
4.98%
Microsoft Corp.
3.67%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.69%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.42%
Broadcom Inc.
1.91%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.88%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.58%
Tesla, Inc.
1.32%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.32%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
1.26%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.26%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.18%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.15%
Equinix, Inc.
0.97%
Frequently asked questions about CGGO and NZAC
How have the CGGO and NZAC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 1, 2026, CGGO is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD), while NZAC has returned 9.54%. That puts CGGO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGGO or NZAC?
Year-to-date, the CGGO ETF saw +$2.40B in flows, compared to -$457K for NZAC.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGGO or NZAC?
Over the past year, CGGO had a volatility of 18.77%, while NZAC experienced 12.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGGO or NZAC?
As of September 1, 2026, CGGO holds $11.89 B in assets under management (AUM), while NZAC manages $195.89 M.
What sectors do the CGGO and NZAC ETFs invest in?
CGGO leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, NZAC focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CGGO ETF and NZAC ETF?
CGGO top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Micron Technology, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc.. NZAC holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGGO or NZAC?
CGGO holds 105 securities with 40.71% of its assets in the top 15. NZAC has 621 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.35%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
