CGGOvsCRBNETF Comparison
VS
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. CGGO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.2% for CRBN. CGGO is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2.40B in YTD flows. CRBN performs worse with 12.29% YTD performance, and +$61M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGGO and CRBN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGGO vs CRBN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGGO CRBN | -0.16%+0.91% | -3.56%+0.89% | +14.97%+12.29% | +24.42%+20.70% | +71.12%+73.19% | n/a+64.74% |
| Flows | CGGO CRBN | +$370M- | +$861M+$38M | +$2.40B+$61M | +$3.23B-$52M | +$6.96B-$187M | --$79M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGGO CRBN | +23.21%+14.93% | +18.77%+13.93% | +16.69%+14.41% | n/a+16.07% |
| Max drawdown | CGGO CRBN | -10.30%-4.72% | -12.83%-10.24% | -17.75%-16.48% | n/a-26.92% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGGO CRBN | 71d62d | 47d50d | 128d87d | n/a752d |
Trading data
CGGO | CRBN | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.02 | $258.31 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $39.75 | $257.07 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGGO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCGGO | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CGGO | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.02 | $258.31 |
| 1D performance | +0.68% | +0.48% |
| AuM | $11.89 B | $1.17 B |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
CGGO | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Capital Group | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index |
| N° of holdings | 105 | 1065 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 22, 2022 | December 8, 2014 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGGO
USA
51.52%
France
7.26%
Other
41.22%
CRBN
USA
62.36%
Other
37.64%
Sectors
CGGO
Technology
38.79%
Finance
13.32%
Industrials
12.86%
Healthcare
8.94%
Other
26.09%
CRBN
Technology
35.84%
Finance
22.33%
Industrials
8.6%
Healthcare
8.3%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.02%
Other
16.91%
Diversification
CGGO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.71%
CRBN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CGGO
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
6.40%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.72%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.38%
Broadcom Inc.
3.37%
SK hynix, Inc.
3.15%
Western Digital Corp.
2.82%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund
2.78%
ASML Holding NV
2.53%
Microsoft Corp.
1.88%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.87%
Aon Plc
1.72%
3i Group Plc
1.63%
Starbucks Corp.
1.57%
Siemens AG
1.50%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.39%
CRBN
Apple, Inc.
4.91%
NVIDIA Corp.
4.47%
Microsoft Corp.
3.17%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.29%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.06%
Broadcom Inc.
1.74%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.70%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.43%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.17%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.01%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.98%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.92%
Tesla, Inc.
0.91%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.80%
Johnson & Johnson
0.78%
Frequently asked questions about CGGO and CRBN
How have the CGGO and CRBN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 1, 2026, CGGO is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD), while CRBN has returned 12.29%. That puts CGGO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGGO or CRBN?
Year-to-date, the CGGO ETF saw +$2.40B in flows, compared to +$61M for CRBN.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGGO or CRBN?
Over the past year, CGGO had a volatility of 18.77%, while CRBN experienced 13.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGGO or CRBN?
As of September 1, 2026, CGGO holds $11.89 B in assets under management (AUM), while CRBN manages $1.17 B.
What sectors do the CGGO and CRBN ETFs invest in?
CGGO leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, CRBN focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CGGO ETF and CRBN ETF?
CGGO top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Micron Technology, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc.. CRBN holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGGO or CRBN?
CGGO holds 105 securities with 40.71% of its assets in the top 15. CRBN has 1072 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.33%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
