Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CGGOvsACWIETF Comparison
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. CGGO's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. In contrast, ACWI's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. CGGO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.47%, versus 0.32% for ACWI. CGGO is down -0.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$966M in YTD flows. ACWI performs worse with -1.43% YTD performance, and +$2.87B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGGO and ACWI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CGGO vs ACWI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGGO ACWI | -3.59%-4.35% | +1.00%-0.68% | -0.06%-1.43% | +23.29%+23.16% | +66.06%+70.61% | n/a+59.57% |
| Flows | CGGO ACWI | +$299M+$1.30B | +$1.11B+$3.68B | +$966M+$2.87B | +$2.79B+$5.06B | +$6.04B+$712M | -+$4.69B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGGO ACWI | +15.37%+12.75% | +17.59%+16.62% | +14.80%+13.72% | n/a+15.57% |
| Max drawdown | CGGO ACWI | -6.25%-6.07% | -14.14%-13.45% | -17.75%-16.56% | n/a-26.35% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGGO ACWI | 14d16d | 45d45d | 128d87d | n/a750d |
CGGO | ACWI | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.29 | $139.54 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $34.50 | $140.45 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CGGO | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CGGO | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.29 | $139.54 |
| 1D performance | -0.61% | -0.65% |
| AuM | $9.05 B | $27.58 B |
| E/R | 0.47% | 0.32% |
CGGO | ACWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Capital Group | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI ACWI Index |
| N° of holdings | 91 | 2090 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 22, 2022 | March 26, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CGGO and ACWI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, CGGO is down -0.06% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWI has lost -1.43%. That puts CGGO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGGO or ACWI?
Year-to-date, the CGGO ETF saw +$966M in flows, compared to +$2.87B for ACWI.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGGO or ACWI?
Over the past year, CGGO had a volatility of 17.59%, while ACWI experienced 16.62%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGGO or ACWI?
As of March 12, 2026, CGGO holds $9.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while ACWI manages $27.58 B.
What sectors do the CGGO and ACWI ETFs invest in?
CGGO leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. Meanwhile, ACWI focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CGGO ETF and ACWI ETF?
CGGO top holdings include US8740391003, MICRON TECHNOLOGY and BROADCOM LIMITED. ACWI holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGGO or ACWI?
CGGO holds 99 securities with 37.72% of its assets in the top 15. ACWI has 2264 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.6%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
