CGBLvsMFULETF Comparison
VS
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Moderate segment. Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) is part of the Multi-Asset: Other segment. CGBL's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, MFUL's top sector exposures are Sovereign, Finance and Technology. CGBL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.33%, versus 1.48% for MFUL. CGBL is up 7.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2.96B in YTD flows. MFUL performs worse with 2.83% YTD performance, and -$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGBL and MFUL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGBL vs MFUL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGBL MFUL | -1.87%-0.88% | +1.12%+0.90% | +7.39%+2.83% | +9.95%+3.32% | n/a+15.61% | n/an/a |
| Flows | CGBL MFUL | +$362M- | +$988M-$558K | +$2.96B-$1M | +$3.95B-$26M | --$78M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGBL MFUL | +9.04%+4.24% | +10.47%+4.40% | n/a+4.09% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CGBL MFUL | -2.95%-1.42% | -7.88%-3.43% | n/a-4.60% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CGBL MFUL | 34d28d | 50d65d | n/a205d | n/an/a |
Trading data
CGBL | MFUL | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.63 | $22.38 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $37.47 | $22.34 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CGBL | MFUL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.63 | $22.38 |
| 1D performance | +0.43% | +0.18% |
| AuM | $7.72 B | $7.26 M |
| E/R | 0.33% | 1.48% |
Characteristics
CGBL | MFUL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Capital Group | Mohr Funds |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 1103 | 32535 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 26, 2023 | November 3, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGBL
USA
78.21%
Other
21.79%
MFUL
USA
77.3%
Other
22.7%
Sectors
CGBL
Technology
22.71%
Finance
14.77%
Industrials
11.33%
Sovereign
8.88%
Other
42.31%
MFUL
Sovereign
34.35%
Finance
10.43%
Technology
8.53%
Other
46.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.93%
MFUL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.57%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CGBL
Broadcom Inc.
4.75%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund
4.12%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.91%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.68%
Apple, Inc.
2.32%
Microsoft Corp.
2.28%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.22%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.91%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.21%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.15%
The Boeing Co.
1.12%
ATI, Inc.
1.07%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
1.07%
USA, Bonds 5% 15may2046, USD
1.07%
Bank of America Corp.
1.05%
MFUL
US78467V1035
5.20%
US72201R5853
3.81%
USA, Notes FRN 31oct2027, USD (BK-2027)
3.66%
USA, Notes FRN 30apr2028, USD (BB-2028)
3.65%
USA, Notes FRN 31jan2028, USD (AX-2028)
3.65%
USA, Notes FRN 31jul2027, USD (BF-2027)
1.19%
Chevron Corp.
1.08%
USA, Bills 0% 3sep2026, USD (364D)
1.07%
USA, Bills 0% 10sep2026, USD (182D)
1.04%
USA, Notes 0.5% 30apr2027, USD (K-2027)
0.99%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
0.93%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
0.86%
USA, Notes FRN 31jul2028, USD (BF-2028)
0.86%
USA, Bills 0% 29oct2026, USD (364D)
0.83%
USA, Bills 0% 1oct2026, USD (364D)
0.75%
Frequently asked questions about CGBL and MFUL
How have the CGBL and MFUL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, CGBL is up 7.39% year-to-date (YTD), while MFUL has returned 2.83%. That puts CGBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGBL or MFUL?
Year-to-date, the CGBL ETF saw +$2.96B in flows, compared to -$1M for MFUL.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGBL or MFUL?
Over the past year, CGBL had a volatility of 10.47%, while MFUL experienced 4.4%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGBL or MFUL?
As of September 11, 2026, CGBL holds $7.72 B in assets under management (AUM), while MFUL manages $7.26 M.
What sectors do the CGBL and MFUL ETFs invest in?
CGBL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, MFUL focuses on Sovereign, Finance and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the CGBL ETF and MFUL ETF?
CGBL top holdings include Broadcom Inc., Capital Group Central Cash Fund and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.. MFUL holds in its top three: US78467V1035, US72201R5853 and USA, Notes FRN 31oct2027, USD (BK-2027).
Which ETF is more diversified: CGBL or MFUL?
CGBL holds 1862 securities with 30.93% of its assets in the top 15. MFUL has 36512 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.57%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGBL & MFUL
A Close Look at Capital Group's 5 New Active ETFs Listed on NYSE ARCA
October 26, 2023
CGBL
Advertisement
Advertisement
