CGBLvsHNDLETF Comparison
VS
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Moderate segment. Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) is part of the Multi-Asset: Other segment. CGBL's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, HNDL's top sector exposures are Sovereign, Technology and Finance. CGBL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.33%, versus 0.94% for HNDL. CGBL is up 7.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2.96B in YTD flows. HNDL performs worse with 5.63% YTD performance, and -$14M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGBL and HNDL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGBL vs HNDL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGBL HNDL | -1.87%-1.50% | +1.12%-0.84% | +7.39%+5.63% | +9.95%+6.77% | n/a+36.03% | n/a+20.38% |
| Flows | CGBL HNDL | +$362M+$16M | +$988M+$11M | +$2.96B-$14M | +$3.95B-$48M | --$424M | --$147M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGBL HNDL | +9.04%+6.28% | +10.47%+7.29% | n/a+9.75% | n/a+11.84% |
| Max drawdown | CGBL HNDL | -2.95%-2.72% | -7.88%-5.00% | n/a-11.72% | n/a-23.83% |
| Max drawdown duration | CGBL HNDL | 34d26d | 50d46d | n/a206d | n/a961d |
Trading data
CGBL | HNDL | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.63 | $22.25 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $37.47 | $22.16 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGBL
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCGBL | HNDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CGBL | HNDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.63 | $22.25 |
| 1D performance | +0.43% | +0.39% |
| AuM | $7.72 B | $635.83 M |
| E/R | 0.33% | 0.94% |
Characteristics
CGBL | HNDL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Capital Group | Strategy Shares |
| Benchmark | - | Nasdaq 7HANDL Base Index |
| N° of holdings | 1103 | 14494 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 26, 2023 | January 10, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGBL
USA
78.21%
Other
21.79%
HNDL
USA
73.84%
Other
26.16%
Sectors
CGBL
Technology
22.71%
Finance
14.77%
Industrials
11.33%
Sovereign
8.88%
Other
42.31%
HNDL
Sovereign
20.55%
Technology
14%
Finance
12.85%
Utilities
7.29%
Other
45.31%
Diversification
CGBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.93%
HNDL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
25.68%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CGBL
Broadcom Inc.
4.75%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund
4.12%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.91%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.68%
Apple, Inc.
2.32%
Microsoft Corp.
2.28%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.22%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.91%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.21%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.15%
The Boeing Co.
1.12%
ATI, Inc.
1.07%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
1.07%
USA, Bonds 5% 15may2046, USD
1.07%
Bank of America Corp.
1.05%
HNDL
US37954Y2937
7.70%
US37954Y6573
3.75%
US25434V8726
2.47%
Apple, Inc.
1.95%
NVIDIA Corp.
1.61%
Microsoft Corp.
1.38%
USA, Bills 0% 21jan2027, USD (364D)
1.09%
Broadcom Inc.
0.93%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.91%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
0.88%
Amazon.com, Inc.
0.88%
Welltower, Inc.
0.62%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.52%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.51%
Walmart, Inc.
0.49%
Frequently asked questions about CGBL and HNDL
How have the CGBL and HNDL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, CGBL is up 7.39% year-to-date (YTD), while HNDL has returned 5.63%. That puts CGBL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGBL or HNDL?
Year-to-date, the CGBL ETF saw +$2.96B in flows, compared to -$14M for HNDL.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGBL or HNDL?
Over the past year, CGBL had a volatility of 10.47%, while HNDL experienced 7.29%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGBL or HNDL?
As of September 11, 2026, CGBL holds $7.72 B in assets under management (AUM), while HNDL manages $635.83 M.
What sectors do the CGBL and HNDL ETFs invest in?
CGBL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, HNDL focuses on Sovereign, Technology and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the CGBL ETF and HNDL ETF?
CGBL top holdings include Broadcom Inc., Capital Group Central Cash Fund and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.. HNDL holds in its top three: US37954Y2937, US37954Y6573 and US25434V8726.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGBL or HNDL?
CGBL holds 1862 securities with 30.93% of its assets in the top 15. HNDL has 25250 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.68%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGBL & HNDL
A Close Look at Capital Group's 5 New Active ETFs Listed on NYSE ARCA
October 26, 2023
CGBL
Advertisement
Advertisement
