CGBLvsBAMAETF Comparison
VS
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Moderate segment. Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) is part of the Multi-Asset: Other segment. CGBL's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, BAMA's top sector exposures are Technology, Sovereign and Finance. CGBL is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.33%, versus 1.03% for BAMA. CGBL is up 7.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2.96B in YTD flows. BAMA performs better with 8.89% YTD performance, and -$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CGBL and BAMA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CGBL vs BAMA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGBL BAMA | -1.87%-0.43% | +1.12%+1.77% | +7.39%+8.89% | +9.95%+11.86% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | CGBL BAMA | +$362M-$2M | +$988M-$4M | +$2.96B-$1M | +$3.95B-$2M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CGBL BAMA | +9.04%+10.52% | +10.47%+10.69% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CGBL BAMA | -2.95%-3.96% | -7.88%-7.36% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CGBL BAMA | 34d49d | 50d48d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
CGBL | BAMA | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.63 | $36.68 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $37.47 | $36.44 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CGBL | BAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.63 | $36.68 |
| 1D performance | +0.43% | +0.66% |
| AuM | $7.72 B | $48.78 M |
| E/R | 0.33% | 1.03% |
Characteristics
CGBL | BAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Capital Group | Brookstone Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 1103 | 12935 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 26, 2023 | September 28, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CGBL
USA
78.21%
Other
21.79%
BAMA
USA
72.3%
Other
27.7%
Sectors
CGBL
Technology
22.71%
Finance
14.77%
Industrials
11.33%
Sovereign
8.88%
Other
42.31%
BAMA
Technology
31.26%
Sovereign
22.19%
Finance
12.54%
Industrials
7.46%
Other
26.54%
Advertisement
Diversification
CGBL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.93%
BAMA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
26.75%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CGBL
Broadcom Inc.
4.75%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund
4.12%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.91%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.68%
Apple, Inc.
2.32%
Microsoft Corp.
2.28%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
2.22%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.91%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.21%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.15%
The Boeing Co.
1.12%
ATI, Inc.
1.07%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
1.07%
USA, Bonds 5% 15may2046, USD
1.07%
Bank of America Corp.
1.05%
BAMA
NVIDIA Corp.
4.92%
Microsoft Corp.
3.50%
Apple, Inc.
3.10%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.11%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.87%
Broadcom Inc.
1.87%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.71%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.42%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.24%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.95%
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.94%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.92%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.79%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.76%
Tesla, Inc.
0.67%
Frequently asked questions about CGBL and BAMA
How have the CGBL and BAMA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, CGBL is up 7.39% year-to-date (YTD), while BAMA has returned 8.89%. That puts BAMA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CGBL or BAMA?
Year-to-date, the CGBL ETF saw +$2.96B in flows, compared to -$1M for BAMA.
Which ETF is more volatile: CGBL or BAMA?
Over the past year, CGBL had a volatility of 10.47%, while BAMA experienced 10.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: CGBL or BAMA?
As of September 11, 2026, CGBL holds $7.72 B in assets under management (AUM), while BAMA manages $48.78 M.
What sectors do the CGBL and BAMA ETFs invest in?
CGBL leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, BAMA focuses on Technology, Sovereign and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the CGBL ETF and BAMA ETF?
CGBL top holdings include Broadcom Inc., Capital Group Central Cash Fund and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.. BAMA holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGBL or BAMA?
CGBL holds 1862 securities with 30.93% of its assets in the top 15. BAMA has 14422 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.75%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CGBL & BAMA
A Close Look at Capital Group's 5 New Active ETFs Listed on NYSE ARCA
October 26, 2023
CGBL
Advertisement
Advertisement
