Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CFOvsULVMETF Comparison
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CFO) belongs to the US Low Volatility segment. VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. CFO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, ULVM's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. CFO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.25% for ULVM. CFO is up 1.03% year-to-date (YTD) with -$8M in YTD flows. ULVM performs better with 4.94% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CFO and ULVM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CFO vs ULVM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CFO ULVM | -3.21%-2.76% | +0.37%+4.12% | +1.03%+4.94% | +12.36%+23.44% | +31.12%+66.52% | +23.56%+72.21% |
| Flows | CFO ULVM | -$4M+$5M | -$11M+$19M | -$8M+$19M | -$54M+$54M | -$442M-$69M | -$447M-$413M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CFO ULVM | +10.93%+11.25% | +16.04%+17.01% | +12.96%+14.04% | +13.28%+15.71% |
| Max drawdown | CFO ULVM | -5.28%-4.40% | -11.96%-13.34% | -17.14%-18.21% | -24.25%-19.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | CFO ULVM | 10d14d | 37d46d | 254d232d | 1039d717d |
CFO | ULVM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $74.24 | $95.32 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $74.25 | $95.54 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CFO | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CFO | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $74.24 | $95.32 |
| 1D performance | -0.01% | -0.23% |
| AuM | $397.34 M | $234.06 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.25% |
CFO | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VictoryShares | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Victory US Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index | Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index |
| N° of holdings | 469 | 118 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 1, 2014 | October 24, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CFO and ULVM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, CFO is up 1.03% year-to-date (YTD), while ULVM has returned 4.94%. That puts ULVM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CFO or ULVM?
Year-to-date, the CFO ETF saw -$8M in flows, compared to +$19M for ULVM.
Which ETF is more volatile: CFO or ULVM?
Over the past year, CFO had a volatility of 16.04%, while ULVM experienced 17.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: CFO or ULVM?
As of March 12, 2026, CFO holds $397.34 M in assets under management (AUM), while ULVM manages $234.06 M.
What sectors do the CFO and ULVM ETFs invest in?
CFO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, ULVM focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CFO ETF and ULVM ETF?
CFO top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, CARDINAL HEALTH and EVERGY. ULVM holds in its top three: CENTERPOINT ENERGY, REALTY INCOME REIT and AMEREN.
Which ETF is more diversified: CFO or ULVM?
CFO holds 486 securities with 5.38% of its assets in the top 15. ULVM has 121 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.39%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
