Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CFOvsIMCBETF Comparison
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CFO) belongs to the US Low Volatility segment. iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. CFO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, IMCB's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. CFO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.04% for IMCB. CFO is up 2.78% year-to-date (YTD) with -$8M in YTD flows. IMCB performs better with 3.09% YTD performance, and +$17M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CFO and IMCB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CFO vs IMCB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CFO IMCB | -2.71%-2.64% | +2.48%+2.03% | +2.78%+3.09% | +12.52%+17.19% | +32.03%+51.89% | +27.53%+48.05% |
| Flows | CFO IMCB | -$4M+$5M | -$11M+$38M | -$8M+$17M | -$54M+$302M | -$442M+$399M | -$447M+$286M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CFO IMCB | +10.75%+13.02% | +16.03%+18.20% | +12.95%+15.33% | +13.28%+17.66% |
| Max drawdown | CFO IMCB | -3.64%-3.97% | -11.96%-13.82% | -17.14%-19.88% | -24.25%-25.13% |
| Max drawdown duration | CFO IMCB | 8d12d | 37d46d | 254d238d | 1039d835d |
CFO | IMCB | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.27 | $84.97 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $75.52 | $85.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CFO | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CFO | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.27 | $84.97 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | -0.29% |
| AuM | $404.20 M | $1.46 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.04% |
CFO | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VictoryShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Victory US Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index | Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 469 | 371 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 1, 2014 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CFO and IMCB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, CFO is up 2.78% year-to-date (YTD), while IMCB has returned 3.09%. That puts IMCB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CFO or IMCB?
Year-to-date, the CFO ETF saw -$8M in flows, compared to +$17M for IMCB.
Which ETF is more volatile: CFO or IMCB?
Over the past year, CFO had a volatility of 16.03%, while IMCB experienced 18.2%.
Which ETF is bigger: CFO or IMCB?
As of March 10, 2026, CFO holds $404.20 M in assets under management (AUM), while IMCB manages $1.46 B.
What sectors do the CFO and IMCB ETFs invest in?
CFO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, IMCB focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the CFO ETF and IMCB ETF?
CFO top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, CARDINAL HEALTH and EVERGY. IMCB holds in its top three: NEWMONT CORP, WESTERN DIGITAL and FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: CFO or IMCB?
CFO holds 486 securities with 5.38% of its assets in the top 15. IMCB has 403 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.81%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
