Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CFOvsGSEWETF Comparison
VictoryShares US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CFO) belongs to the US Low Volatility segment. Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is part of the US Large Cap segment. CFO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, GSEW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. CFO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.09% for GSEW. CFO is up 1.03% year-to-date (YTD) with -$8M in YTD flows. GSEW performs better with 1.97% YTD performance, and +$71M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CFO and GSEW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CFO vs GSEW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CFO GSEW | -3.21%-2.47% | +0.37%+0.37% | +1.03%+1.97% | +12.36%+16.99% | +31.12%+58.43% | +23.56%+52.21% |
| Flows | CFO GSEW | -$4M+$45M | -$11M+$118M | -$8M+$71M | -$54M+$299M | -$442M+$812M | -$447M+$716M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CFO GSEW | +10.93%+12.44% | +16.04%+17.69% | +12.96%+14.48% | +13.28%+16.96% |
| Max drawdown | CFO GSEW | -5.28%-3.47% | -11.96%-13.46% | -17.14%-18.23% | -24.25%-25.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | CFO GSEW | 10d13d | 37d46d | 254d211d | 1039d834d |
CFO | GSEW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $74.24 | $85.14 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $74.25 | $85.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CFO | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CFO | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $74.24 | $85.14 |
| 1D performance | -0.01% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $397.34 M | $1.60 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.09% |
CFO | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VictoryShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Victory US Large Cap 500 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index | Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index |
| N° of holdings | 469 | 469 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 1, 2014 | December 9, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CFO and GSEW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, CFO is up 1.03% year-to-date (YTD), while GSEW has returned 1.97%. That puts GSEW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CFO or GSEW?
Year-to-date, the CFO ETF saw -$8M in flows, compared to +$71M for GSEW.
Which ETF is more volatile: CFO or GSEW?
Over the past year, CFO had a volatility of 16.04%, while GSEW experienced 17.69%.
Which ETF is bigger: CFO or GSEW?
As of March 12, 2026, CFO holds $397.34 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSEW manages $1.60 B.
What sectors do the CFO and GSEW ETFs invest in?
CFO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, GSEW focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the CFO ETF and GSEW ETF?
CFO top holdings include WESTERN DIGITAL, CARDINAL HEALTH and EVERGY. GSEW holds in its top three: US92333F1012, US80004C2008 and BLOOM ENERGY CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: CFO or GSEW?
CFO holds 486 securities with 5.38% of its assets in the top 15. GSEW has 497 securities and a top 15 weight of 3.64%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
