CEFSvsMYMJETF Comparison
VS
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Other segment. State Street SPDR My2030 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMJ) is part of the Municipal Bonds segment. CEFS's top 2 sector exposures are Non-Corporate and Finance. In contrast, MYMJ's top sector exposures are Municipal. CEFS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.61%, versus 0.2% for MYMJ. CEFS is up 16.61% year-to-date (YTD) with +$38M in YTD flows. MYMJ performs worse with 0.52% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CEFS and MYMJ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CEFS vs MYMJ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CEFS MYMJ | +1.93%-0.13% | +0.23%-0.44% | +16.61%+0.52% | +21.85%+3.15% | +76.79%n/a | +90.47%n/a |
| Flows | CEFS MYMJ | +$6M- | +$20M- | +$38M+$2M | +$80M+$4M | +$230M- | +$286M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CEFS MYMJ | +10.52%+1.18% | +9.17%+1.26% | +10.55%n/a | +12.21%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CEFS MYMJ | -4.11%-0.87% | -4.75%-1.51% | -12.48%n/a | -16.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CEFS MYMJ | 51d58d | 41d185d | 104dn/a | 436dn/a |
Trading data
CEFS | MYMJ | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.27 | $24.57 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $25.28 | $24.50 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CEFS | MYMJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.27 | $24.57 |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | +0.29% |
| AuM | $439.74 M | $12.24 M |
| E/R | 2.61% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
CEFS | MYMJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Saba Capital | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 39 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 21, 2017 | September 23, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CEFS
USA
35.86%
Other
64.14%
MYMJ
USA
40.19%
Other
59.81%
Sectors
CEFS
Non-Corporate
35.41%
Other
64.59%
MYMJ
Municipal
40.19%
Other
59.81%
Advertisement
Diversification
CEFS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
58.26%
MYMJ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
34.71%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CEFS
US09260K1016
11.41%
Virtus Dividend Interest & Premium Strategy Fund
6.95%
ASA Gold & Precious Metals Ltd.
6.61%
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
4.82%
US7809151043
3.58%
US36242H1041
3.24%
US3688021043
2.91%
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
2.90%
Neuberger Next Generation Connectivity Fund Inc.
2.57%
US6706EW1000
2.51%
US64129H1041
2.39%
US92835W1071
2.25%
US5928351023
2.16%
BlackRock Technology & Private Equity Term Trust
2.05%
US8954361031
1.89%
MYMJ
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 5% 1jul2030, USD
3.81%
City of New York, FRN 1feb1996, USD
2.61%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 5% 1dec2037, USD (2020C)
2.56%
US235219MY54
2.38%
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, 5% 15jun2030, USD (2016)
2.28%
New York Urban Development Corp., 5% 15mar2038, USD (2020C)
2.27%
Chicago, 5% 1nov2030, USD
2.25%
Connecticut, 5% 1may2037, USD
2.18%
Ohio Water Development Authority, 5% 1jun2033, USD (2020A)
2.17%
US91417NKX20
2.10%
US709224ZR30
2.08%
US717893Q203
2.04%
Alabama Public School and College Authority, 5% 1nov2034, USD (2020-A)
2.04%
US2077583D38
1.97%
US283735AT50
1.97%
Frequently asked questions about CEFS and MYMJ
How have the CEFS and MYMJ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, CEFS is up 16.61% year-to-date (YTD), while MYMJ has returned 0.52%. That puts CEFS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CEFS or MYMJ?
Year-to-date, the CEFS ETF saw +$38M in flows, compared to +$2M for MYMJ.
Which ETF is more volatile: CEFS or MYMJ?
Over the past year, CEFS had a volatility of 9.17%, while MYMJ experienced 1.26%.
Which ETF is bigger: CEFS or MYMJ?
As of September 2, 2026, CEFS holds $439.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while MYMJ manages $12.24 M.
What sectors do the CEFS and MYMJ ETFs invest in?
CEFS leans toward sectors like Non-Corporate. Meanwhile, MYMJ focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the CEFS ETF and MYMJ ETF?
CEFS top holdings include US09260K1016, Virtus Dividend Interest & Premium Strategy Fund and ASA Gold & Precious Metals Ltd.. MYMJ holds in its top three: Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 5% 1jul2030, USD, City of New York, FRN 1feb1996, USD and New York Transportation Development Corp., 5% 1dec2037, USD (2020C).
Which ETF is more diversified: CEFS or MYMJ?
CEFS holds 71 securities with 58.26% of its assets in the top 15. MYMJ has 94 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.71%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
