CEFSvsIALTETF Comparison
Saba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF
Saba Opportunistically Hedged Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) and iShares Systematic Alternatives Active ETF (IALT) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. CEFS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.61%, versus 0.99% for IALT. CEFS is up 13.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$43M in YTD flows. IALT performs better with 17.71% YTD performance, and +$7.33B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CEFS and IALT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CEFS vs IALT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CEFS IALT | -0.23%+0.89% | -1.98%+4.50% | +13.02%+17.71% | +15.16%n/a | +78.38%n/a | +80.49%n/a |
| Flows | CEFS IALT | +$4M+$1.72B | +$19M+$2.37B | +$43M+$7.33B | +$78M- | +$228M- | +$288M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CEFS IALT | +8.81%+5.33% | +9.52%n/a | +10.43%n/a | +12.22%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CEFS IALT | -4.30%-1.97% | -4.75%n/a | -12.48%n/a | -16.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CEFS IALT | 59d15d | 41dn/a | 104dn/a | 436dn/a |
CEFS | IALT | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.91 | $29.71 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $24.18 | $29.88 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
CEFS | IALT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.91 | $29.71 |
| 1D performance | -1.12% | -0.57% |
| AuM | $426.78 M | $7.66 B |
| E/R | 2.61% | 0.99% |
CEFS | IALT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Saba Capital | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 21, 2017 | December 10, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
