Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CEFAvsNTSIETF Comparison
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF
Global X S&P Catholic Values Developed ex-U.S. ETF (CEFA) belongs to the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) is part of the Alternatives segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. CEFA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.26% for NTSI. CEFA is down -0.24% year-to-date (YTD) with +$11M in YTD flows. NTSI performs worse with -0.31% YTD performance, and +$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CEFA and NTSI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CEFA vs NTSI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CEFA NTSI | -7.15%-7.37% | -0.06%+0.35% | -0.24%-0.31% | +18.92%+19.85% | +49.26%+44.66% | +36.15%n/a |
| Flows | CEFA NTSI | +$9M- | +$12M+$16M | +$11M+$16M | +$18M+$36M | +$21M+$140M | +$32M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CEFA NTSI | +15.27%+14.20% | +16.38%+15.65% | +14.04%+13.69% | +15.62%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CEFA NTSI | -8.69%-9.20% | -14.08%-12.78% | -14.76%-13.88% | -31.74%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CEFA NTSI | 12d12d | 42d41d | 214d227d | 905dn/a |
CEFA | NTSI | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.67 | $43.85 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $37.15 | $44.41 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CEFA | NTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CEFA | NTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.67 | $43.85 |
| 1D performance | -1.28% | -1.25% |
| AuM | $40.13 M | $460.94 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.26% |
CEFA | NTSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | S&P Developed ex-U.S. Catholic Values Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 339 | 428 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 22, 2020 | May 20, 2021 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CEFA and NTSI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, CEFA is down -0.24% year-to-date (YTD), while NTSI has lost -0.31%. That puts CEFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CEFA or NTSI?
Year-to-date, the CEFA ETF saw +$11M in flows, compared to +$16M for NTSI.
Which ETF is more volatile: CEFA or NTSI?
Over the past year, CEFA had a volatility of 16.38%, while NTSI experienced 15.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: CEFA or NTSI?
As of March 13, 2026, CEFA holds $40.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while NTSI manages $460.94 M.
What sectors do the CEFA and NTSI ETFs invest in?
CEFA leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, NTSI focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CEFA ETF and NTSI ETF?
CEFA top holdings include ASML HOLDING, ESSILORLUXOTTICA and SIEMENS. NTSI holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, HSBC HOLDINGS and NOVARTIS.
Which ETF is more diversified: CEFA or NTSI?
CEFA holds 358 securities with 22.09% of its assets in the top 15. NTSI has 451 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.82%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
