Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CDEIvsTSPAETF Comparison
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Index ETF
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF (TSPA) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. CDEI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.14%, versus 0.34% for TSPA. CDEI is down -2.31% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. TSPA performs better with -0.44% YTD performance, and +$57M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CDEI and TSPA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CDEI vs TSPA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CDEI TSPA | -2.46%-2.48% | -1.46%-0.27% | -2.31%-0.44% | +20.08%+22.15% | +69.48%+84.41% | n/an/a |
| Flows | CDEI TSPA | -+$16M | -+$67M | -+$57M | -$8M+$476M | -$20M+$1.76B | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CDEI TSPA | +11.61%+12.05% | +18.11%+18.39% | +14.96%+15.17% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CDEI TSPA | -4.61%-3.61% | -13.80%-13.81% | -19.34%-19.15% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CDEI TSPA | 57d40d | 45d45d | 127d127d | n/an/a |
CDEI | TSPA | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $80.41 | $42.47 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $80.66 | $42.53 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CDEI | TSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CDEI | TSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $80.41 | $42.47 |
| 1D performance | -0.31% | -0.14% |
| AuM | $16.14 M | $2.16 B |
| E/R | 0.14% | 0.34% |
CDEI | TSPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Morgan Stanley | T. Rowe Price |
| Benchmark | Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity Research Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 255 | 253 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2023 | June 8, 2021 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CDEI and TSPA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, CDEI is down -2.31% year-to-date (YTD), while TSPA has lost -0.44%. That puts TSPA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CDEI or TSPA?
Year-to-date, the CDEI ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$57M for TSPA.
Which ETF is more volatile: CDEI or TSPA?
Over the past year, CDEI had a volatility of 18.11%, while TSPA experienced 18.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: CDEI or TSPA?
As of March 9, 2026, CDEI holds $16.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while TSPA manages $2.16 B.
What sectors do the CDEI and TSPA ETFs invest in?
CDEI leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. Meanwhile, TSPA focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the CDEI ETF and TSPA ETF?
CDEI top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. TSPA holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CDEI or TSPA?
CDEI holds 260 securities with 55.58% of its assets in the top 15. TSPA has 261 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.76%.
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
Morgan Stanley Launches Six New ESG-Focused ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
