CCRPvsNUBDETF Comparison
VS
Columbia Corporate Bond ETF (CCRP) belongs to the US Corporate IG Bonds segment. Nushares ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) is part of the US Aggregate Bonds segment. CCRP's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, NUBD's top sector exposures are Sovereign, Industrials and Finance. CCRP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.15% for NUBD. CCRP is down -0.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$44M in YTD flows. NUBD performs better with -0.31% YTD performance, and +$40M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CCRP and NUBD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CCRP vs NUBD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CCRP NUBD | +0.42%+0.32% | -1.16%-0.64% | -0.48%-0.31% | n/a+1.91% | n/a+12.19% | n/a-2.15% |
| Flows | CCRP NUBD | -$2M+$27M | -$2M+$47M | +$44M+$40M | -+$84M | -+$212M | -+$276M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CCRP NUBD | +4.26%+3.89% | n/a+3.65% | n/a+5.02% | n/a+5.84% |
| Max drawdown | CCRP NUBD | -2.22%-1.69% | n/a-2.82% | n/a-4.84% | n/a-17.80% |
| Max drawdown duration | CCRP NUBD | 63d63d | n/a183d | n/a318d | n/a1812d |
Trading data
CCRP | NUBD | |
Last sale 8/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $19.37 | $21.64 |
| Previous close 08/31/2026 | $19.39 | $21.76 |
| Consolidated volume 08/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CCRP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCCRP | NUBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CCRP | NUBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $19.37 | $21.64 |
| 1D performance | -0.09% | -0.55% |
| AuM | $52.18 M | $489.66 M |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
CCRP | NUBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Nuveen |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg MSCI US Agg ESG Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 158 | 2126 |
| Asset class | - | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2025 | September 29, 2017 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CCRP
USA
78.49%
Other
21.51%
NUBD
USA
78.64%
Other
21.36%
Sectors
CCRP
Finance
22.25%
Utilities
15.46%
Industrials
12.14%
Healthcare
10.64%
Telecommunication.
7.08%
Other
32.43%
NUBD
Sovereign
46.37%
Industrials
12.61%
Finance
11.06%
Other
29.96%
Advertisement
Diversification
CCRP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.3%
NUBD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
14.13%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CCRP
US19766H2397
4.18%
JP Morgan, 4.622% 23apr2032, USD
3.91%
Bank of America Corporation, 2.299% 21jul2032, USD (N)
3.46%
Amgen, 5.15% 2mar2028, USD
2.53%
Broadcom Inc, 4.2% 15oct2030, USD
2.15%
Bacardi Ltd, 5.4% 15jun2033, USD
1.78%
Verizon Communications, 2.355% 15mar2032, USD
1.72%
T-Mobile USA, 2.55% 15feb2031, USD
1.70%
Merck & Co, 5.2% 22may2036, USD
1.64%
NextEra Energy, 4.685% 1sep2027, USD (M)
1.63%
Morgan Stanley, 5.073% 30jan2037, USD (I)
1.61%
Principal Life Global Funding II, 4.95% 27nov2029, USD (49)
1.59%
UnitedHealth Group, 5% 15apr2034, USD
1.57%
Wells Fargo, 4.844% 20may2032, USD (Y)
1.43%
Canadian Pacific Railway Co, 4% 15mar2029, USD
1.40%
NUBD
USA, Notes 3.625% 30sep2030, USD (AD-2030)
1.67%
USA, Notes 4.125% 31oct2029, USD (AF-2029)
1.09%
US31418D7F32
1.08%
USA, Notes 3.75% 31dec2028, USD (AH-2028)
1.02%
USA, Notes 3.875% 31jul2030, USD (AB-2030)
1.00%
USA, Notes 3.625% 31oct2030, USD (AF-2030)
0.99%
USA, Notes 3.625% 31aug2029, USD (AC-2029)
0.98%
USA, Notes 4.25% 28feb2029, USD (V-2029)
0.84%
USA, Notes 3.625% 31dec2030, USD (AH-2030)
0.81%
USA, Notes 4.625% 30sep2028, USD (AD-2028)
0.81%
USA, Notes 3.875% 30apr2031, USD (Y-2031)
0.80%
USA, Notes 4.25% 30jun2029, USD (AA-2029)
0.79%
USA, Notes 3.5% 30sep2029, USD (AD-2029)
0.76%
USA, Notes 3.875% 30apr2030, USD (Y-2030)
0.74%
USA, Notes 3.5% 30nov2030, USD (AG-2030)
0.74%
Frequently asked questions about CCRP and NUBD
How have the CCRP and NUBD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 31, 2026, CCRP is down -0.48% year-to-date (YTD), while NUBD has lost -0.31%. That puts NUBD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CCRP or NUBD?
Year-to-date, the CCRP ETF saw +$44M in flows, compared to +$40M for NUBD.
Which ETF is bigger: CCRP or NUBD?
As of August 31, 2026, CCRP holds $52.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while NUBD manages $489.66 M.
What sectors do the CCRP and NUBD ETFs invest in?
CCRP leans toward sectors like Finance, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, NUBD focuses on Sovereign, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the CCRP ETF and NUBD ETF?
CCRP top holdings include US19766H2397, JP Morgan, 4.622% 23apr2032, USD and Bank of America Corporation, 2.299% 21jul2032, USD (N). NUBD holds in its top three: USA, Notes 3.625% 30sep2030, USD (AD-2030), USA, Notes 4.125% 31oct2029, USD (AF-2029) and US31418D7F32.
Which ETF is more diversified: CCRP or NUBD?
CCRP holds 173 securities with 32.3% of its assets in the top 15. NUBD has 2383 securities and a top 15 weight of 14.13%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
