CCRPvsIBDUETF Comparison
VS
Columbia Corporate Bond ETF (CCRP) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corporate ETF (IBDU) belong to the same industry segment: US Corporate IG Bonds. CCRP's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, IBDU's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Utilities. CCRP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.49%, versus 0.1% for IBDU. CCRP is down -1.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$47M in YTD flows. IBDU performs better with 0.64% YTD performance, and +$694M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CCRP and IBDU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CCRP vs IBDU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CCRP IBDU | -0.39%+0.30% | -2.06%-0.33% | -1.94%+0.64% | n/a+1.18% | n/a+20.55% | n/a+5.95% |
| Flows | CCRP IBDU | +$4M+$53M | +$2M+$37M | +$47M+$694M | -+$1.08B | -+$3.30B | -+$3.92B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CCRP IBDU | +4.60%+1.95% | n/a+2.01% | n/a+3.49% | n/a+5.25% |
| Max drawdown | CCRP IBDU | -3.42%-1.46% | n/a-1.54% | n/a-2.48% | n/a-18.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | CCRP IBDU | 89d52d | n/a155d | n/a154d | n/a1267d |
Trading data
CCRP | IBDU | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $18.86 | $22.74 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $18.87 | $22.74 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CCRP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCCRP | IBDU | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CCRP | IBDU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $18.86 | $22.74 |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $54.76 M | $3.99 B |
| E/R | 0.49% | 0.1% |
Characteristics
CCRP | IBDU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg December 2029 Maturity Corporate Index |
| N° of holdings | 156 | 679 |
| Asset class | - | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2025 | September 17, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CCRP
USA
82.47%
Other
17.53%
IBDU
USA
86.15%
Other
13.85%
Sectors
CCRP
Finance
21.8%
Utilities
15.48%
Industrials
12.07%
Healthcare
10.61%
Telecommunication.
7.06%
Other
32.98%
IBDU
Finance
29.37%
Technology
11.74%
Utilities
8.99%
Healthcare
8.79%
Industrials
7.22%
Other
33.89%
Advertisement
Diversification
CCRP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.96%
IBDU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.95%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
CCRP
Columbia Short Term Cash Fund
4.91%
JP Morgan, 4.622% 23apr2032, USD
3.89%
Bank of America Corporation, 2.299% 21jul2032, USD (N)
3.45%
Amgen, 5.15% 2mar2028, USD
2.52%
Broadcom Inc, 4.2% 15oct2030, USD
2.14%
Bacardi Ltd, 5.4% 15jun2033, USD
1.78%
Verizon Communications, 2.355% 15mar2032, USD
1.72%
T-Mobile USA, 2.55% 15feb2031, USD
1.69%
Merck & Co, 5.2% 22may2036, USD
1.64%
NextEra Energy, 4.685% 1sep2027, USD (M)
1.63%
Morgan Stanley, 5.073% 30jan2037, USD (I)
1.61%
Principal Life Global Funding II, 4.95% 27nov2029, USD (49)
1.58%
UnitedHealth Group, 5% 15apr2034, USD
1.57%
Wells Fargo, 4.844% 20may2032, USD (Y)
1.43%
Canadian Pacific Railway Co, 4% 15mar2029, USD
1.40%
IBDU
AbbVie, 3.2% 21nov2029, USD
0.97%
Salesforce, 4.65% 15mar2029, USD
0.77%
Verizon Communications, 4.016% 3dec2029, USD
0.64%
Amazon.com, 4% 13mar2029, USD
0.60%
AT&T Inc, 4.35% 1mar2029, USD
0.60%
IBM, 3.5% 15may2029, USD
0.60%
NVIDIA, 4.35% 15jun2029, USD
0.59%
Fiserv, 3.5% 1jul2029, USD
0.58%
Anheuser-Busch InBev, 4.75% 23jan2029, USD
0.57%
Oracle, 4.55% 4feb2029, USD
0.57%
Amazon.com, 4.6% 9jul2029, USD
0.51%
Sumitomo Mitsui FG, 3.04% 16jul2029, USD
0.50%
Cisco Systems, 4.85% 26feb2029, USD
0.50%
AbbVie, 4.8% 15mar2029, USD
0.49%
Wells Fargo, 4.15% 24jan2029, USD (Q)
0.48%
Frequently asked questions about CCRP and IBDU
How have the CCRP and IBDU ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, CCRP is down -1.94% year-to-date (YTD), while IBDU has returned 0.64%. That puts IBDU better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CCRP or IBDU?
Year-to-date, the CCRP ETF saw +$47M in flows, compared to +$694M for IBDU.
Which ETF is bigger: CCRP or IBDU?
As of October 16, 2026, CCRP holds $54.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while IBDU manages $3.99 B.
What sectors do the CCRP and IBDU ETFs invest in?
CCRP leans toward sectors like Finance, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, IBDU focuses on Finance, Technology and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the CCRP ETF and IBDU ETF?
CCRP top holdings include Columbia Short Term Cash Fund, JP Morgan, 4.622% 23apr2032, USD and Bank of America Corporation, 2.299% 21jul2032, USD (N). IBDU holds in its top three: AbbVie, 3.2% 21nov2029, USD, Salesforce, 4.65% 15mar2029, USD and Verizon Communications, 4.016% 3dec2029, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: CCRP or IBDU?
CCRP holds 169 securities with 32.96% of its assets in the top 15. IBDU has 698 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.95%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
