CCNRvsREMXETF Comparison
VS
ALPS CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CCNR's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, REMX's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Utilities. CCNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.58% for REMX. CCNR is up 18.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$46M in YTD flows. REMX performs worse with -26.5% YTD performance, and +$683M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CCNR and REMX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CCNR vs REMX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CCNR REMX | -3.86%-20.11% | +3.57%-26.57% | +18.38%-26.50% | +27.51%-25.12% | n/a-11.63% | n/a-46.62% |
| Flows | CCNR REMX | -$2M-$19M | +$9M-$99M | +$46M+$683M | -$27M+$1.00B | -+$1.65B | -+$1.48B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CCNR REMX | +14.31%+33.64% | +15.96%+40.81% | n/a+35.90% | n/a+35.57% |
| Max drawdown | CCNR REMX | -10.04%-32.07% | -12.80%-49.98% | n/a-49.98% | n/a-72.86% |
| Max drawdown duration | CCNR REMX | 37d53d | 99d163d | n/a163d | n/a1656d |
Trading data
CCNR | REMX | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 7:47 PM | $38.73 | $53.83 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $38.44 | $54.23 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CCNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCCNR | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 7:47 PM
Live
Closed
CCNR | REMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.73 | $53.83 |
| 1D performance | +0.76% | -0.74% |
| AuM | $440.33 M | $1.55 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.58% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CCNR
USA
29.68%
Canada
19.44%
Australia
11.97%
Japan
8%
Other
30.92%
REMX
China
29.99%
Australia
25.15%
USA
23.82%
Other
21.04%
Sectors
CCNR
Non-Energy Materi.
41.26%
Energy
33.38%
Industrials
7.57%
Utilities
7.47%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.33%
Other
2.99%
REMX
Non-Energy Materi.
96.13%
Other
3.87%
Advertisement
Diversification
CCNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
14.84%
REMX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.44%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
CCNR
Nutrien Ltd.
1.41%
Boliden AB
1.22%
Yara International ASA
1.14%
Equinor ASA
0.99%
Murphy Oil Corp.
0.98%
Baytex Energy Corp.
0.98%
Endeavour Mining Plc
0.96%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.94%
Corteva, Inc.
0.93%
Saipem SpA
0.92%
Regis Resources Ltd.
0.92%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
0.89%
EOG Resources, Inc.
0.86%
Chord Energy Corp.
0.86%
Eni SpA
0.84%
REMX
PLS Group Ltd.
8.13%
Albemarle Corp.
8.06%
MP Materials Corp.
6.80%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
6.76%
China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd.
6.53%
Almonty Industries, Inc.
5.73%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
5.72%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co., Ltd.
5.33%
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.
5.08%
Lianyou Metals Co., Ltd.
4.80%
Iluka Resources Ltd.
3.78%
Shenghe Resources Holding Co., Ltd.
3.63%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
3.56%
Liontown Ltd.
3.08%
AMG Critical Materials NV
2.47%
Frequently asked questions about CCNR and REMX
How have the CCNR and REMX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, CCNR is up 18.38% year-to-date (YTD), while REMX has lost -26.5%. That puts CCNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CCNR or REMX?
Year-to-date, the CCNR ETF saw +$46M in flows, compared to +$683M for REMX.
Which ETF is more volatile: CCNR or REMX?
Over the past year, CCNR had a volatility of 15.96%, while REMX experienced 40.81%.
Which ETF is bigger: CCNR or REMX?
As of October 16, 2026, CCNR holds $440.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while REMX manages $1.55 B.
What sectors do the CCNR and REMX ETFs invest in?
CCNR leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, REMX focuses on Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the CCNR ETF and REMX ETF?
CCNR top holdings include Nutrien Ltd., Boliden AB and Yara International ASA. REMX holds in its top three: PLS Group Ltd., Albemarle Corp. and MP Materials Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CCNR or REMX?
CCNR holds 302 securities with 14.84% of its assets in the top 15. REMX has 29 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.44%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CCNR & REMX
There's an ETF for That? Emerging Markets Without China
June 25, 2026
REMX
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
REMX
How PFIC Rules Could Trigger a Year-End Shock for Mining ETFs
October 30, 2025
REMX
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
REMX
Advertisement
Advertisement
