CCNRvsMGNRETF Comparison
VS
ALPS CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) and American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. CCNR's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. In contrast, MGNR's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CCNR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.75% for MGNR. CCNR is up 17.93% year-to-date (YTD) with +$46M in YTD flows. MGNR performs worse with 11.33% YTD performance, and +$919M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CCNR and MGNR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CCNR vs MGNR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CCNR MGNR | -3.52%-6.38% | +3.62%+2.64% | +17.93%+11.33% | +27.22%+18.57% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | CCNR MGNR | +$11K+$63M | +$6M+$471M | +$46M+$919M | -$27M+$975M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CCNR MGNR | +14.43%+21.69% | +15.95%+24.03% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CCNR MGNR | -10.04%-12.94% | -12.80%-15.40% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CCNR MGNR | 40d55d | 99d139d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
CCNR | MGNR | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 3:49 PM | $38.52 | $48.43 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $38.59 | $48.65 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 3:49 PM
Live
Closed
CCNR | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.52 | $48.43 |
| 1D performance | -0.17% | -0.45% |
| AuM | $438.63 M | $1.25 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
CCNR | MGNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | ALPS | American Beacon |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 300 | 44 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 10, 2024 | February 6, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CCNR
USA
29.68%
Canada
19.44%
Australia
11.97%
Japan
8%
Other
30.92%
MGNR
USA
48.17%
Canada
28.99%
Other
22.84%
Sectors
CCNR
Non-Energy Materi.
41.26%
Energy
33.38%
Industrials
7.57%
Utilities
7.47%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.33%
Other
2.99%
MGNR
Non-Energy Materi.
59.73%
Energy
25.15%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.82%
Other
7.3%
Advertisement
Diversification
CCNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
14.84%
MGNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.85%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
CCNR
Nutrien Ltd.
1.41%
Boliden AB
1.22%
Yara International ASA
1.14%
Equinor ASA
0.99%
Murphy Oil Corp.
0.98%
Baytex Energy Corp.
0.98%
Endeavour Mining Plc
0.96%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.94%
Corteva, Inc.
0.93%
Saipem SpA
0.92%
Regis Resources Ltd.
0.92%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
0.89%
EOG Resources, Inc.
0.86%
Chord Energy Corp.
0.86%
Eni SpA
0.84%
MGNR
ArcelorMittal SA
4.49%
Venture Global, Inc.
4.23%
Teck Resources Limited
4.14%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
4.07%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
4.03%
Smurfit WestRock Plc
4.03%
Range Resources Corp.
3.86%
Kinross Gold Corp.
3.82%
Equinox Gold Corp.
3.68%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
3.57%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
3.52%
Antero Resources Corp.
3.51%
Vista Energy SAB de CV
3.47%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
3.32%
Bunge Global SA
3.10%
Frequently asked questions about CCNR and MGNR
How have the CCNR and MGNR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 19, 2026, CCNR is up 17.93% year-to-date (YTD), while MGNR has returned 11.33%. That puts CCNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CCNR or MGNR?
Year-to-date, the CCNR ETF saw +$46M in flows, compared to +$919M for MGNR.
Which ETF is more volatile: CCNR or MGNR?
Over the past year, CCNR had a volatility of 15.95%, while MGNR experienced 24.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: CCNR or MGNR?
As of October 19, 2026, CCNR holds $438.63 M in assets under management (AUM), while MGNR manages $1.25 B.
What sectors do the CCNR and MGNR ETFs invest in?
CCNR leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Industrials. Meanwhile, MGNR focuses on Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the CCNR ETF and MGNR ETF?
CCNR top holdings include Nutrien Ltd., Boliden AB and Yara International ASA. MGNR holds in its top three: ArcelorMittal SA, Venture Global, Inc. and Teck Resources Limited.
Which ETF is more diversified: CCNR or MGNR?
CCNR holds 302 securities with 14.84% of its assets in the top 15. MGNR has 44 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.85%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
