Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CATHvsUSPXETF Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. CATH's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, USPX's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. CATH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.03% for USPX. CATH is down -1.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$33M in YTD flows. USPX performs better with -1.04% YTD performance, and +$54M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CATH and USPX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CATH vs USPX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CATH USPX | -2.47%-2.21% | -2.04%-1.64% | -1.26%-1.04% | +21.58%+22.04% | +77.66%+83.15% | +77.20%+75.55% |
| Flows | CATH USPX | +$20M+$6M | +$39M+$66M | +$33M+$54M | +$71M+$140M | +$80M+$368M | +$207M+$978M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CATH USPX | +11.91%+11.61% | +18.58%+18.33% | +15.11%+14.94% | +17.48%+15.36% |
| Max drawdown | CATH USPX | -3.65%-3.50% | -13.72%-13.90% | -19.35%-19.03% | -26.22%-24.64% |
| Max drawdown duration | CATH USPX | 57d57d | 45d45d | 126d126d | 713d712d |
CATH | USPX | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.08 | $59.11 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $81.14 | $59.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CATH | USPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CATH | USPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.08 | $59.11 |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | -0.14% |
| AuM | $1.12 B | $1.69 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.03% |
CATH | USPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Catholic Values Index | Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index |
| N° of holdings | 426 | 456 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 18, 2016 | June 1, 2016 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CATH and USPX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, CATH is down -1.26% year-to-date (YTD), while USPX has lost -1.04%. That puts USPX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CATH or USPX?
Year-to-date, the CATH ETF saw +$33M in flows, compared to +$54M for USPX.
Which ETF is more volatile: CATH or USPX?
Over the past year, CATH had a volatility of 18.58%, while USPX experienced 18.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: CATH or USPX?
As of March 10, 2026, CATH holds $1.12 B in assets under management (AUM), while USPX manages $1.69 B.
What sectors do the CATH and USPX ETFs invest in?
CATH leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, USPX focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the CATH ETF and USPX ETF?
CATH top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. USPX holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CATH or USPX?
CATH holds 444 securities with 44.74% of its assets in the top 15. USPX has 486 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.07%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
