CATHvsONOFETF Comparison
VS
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) is part of the Multi-Asset: Other segment. CATH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.39% for ONOF. CATH is up 10.87% year-to-date (YTD) with +$139M in YTD flows. ONOF performs worse with 8.98% YTD performance, and -$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CATH and ONOF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CATH vs ONOF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/11/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CATH ONOF | -1.07%-0.82% | +3.62%+3.73% | +10.87%+8.98% | +14.50%+13.26% | +71.18%+41.79% | +72.05%+48.72% |
| Flows | CATH ONOF | +$23M- | +$88M-$4M | +$139M-$13M | +$139M-$10M | +$168M+$9M | +$307M-$65M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CATH ONOF | +12.21%+12.10% | +13.06%+12.27% | +15.33%+14.34% | +17.62%+14.60% |
| Max drawdown | CATH ONOF | -3.55%-3.59% | -9.42%-6.75% | -19.35%-21.66% | -26.22%-25.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | CATH ONOF | 16d19d | 92d107d | 126d205d | 713d756d |
Trading data
CATH | ONOF | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $90.88 | $40.81 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $90.11 | $40.38 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CATH | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CATH | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $90.88 | $40.81 |
| 1D performance | +0.85% | +1.06% |
| AuM | $1.36 B | $141.18 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
CATH | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Catholic Values Index | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 18, 2016 | January 13, 2021 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CATH
Data will be available soon
ONOF
Data will be available soon
Sectors
CATH
Data will be available soon
ONOF
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
CATH
Data will be available soon
ONOF
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
CATH
Data will be available soon
ONOF
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about CATH and ONOF
How have the CATH and ONOF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 11, 2026, CATH is up 10.87% year-to-date (YTD), while ONOF has returned 8.98%. That puts CATH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CATH or ONOF?
Year-to-date, the CATH ETF saw +$139M in flows, compared to -$13M for ONOF.
Which ETF is more volatile: CATH or ONOF?
Over the past year, CATH had a volatility of 13.06%, while ONOF experienced 12.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: CATH or ONOF?
As of September 11, 2026, CATH holds $1.36 B in assets under management (AUM), while ONOF manages $141.18 M.
Advertisement
Advertisement
