Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CATHvsILCBETF Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. CATH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.03% for ILCB. CATH is down -1.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$33M in YTD flows. ILCB performs better with -0.85% YTD performance, and -$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CATH and ILCB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CATH vs ILCB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CATH ILCB | -2.47%-2.17% | -2.04%-1.43% | -1.26%-0.85% | +21.58%+22.24% | +77.66%+83.17% | +77.20%+82.14% |
| Flows | CATH ILCB | +$20M-$14M | +$39M-$14M | +$33M-$19M | +$71M-$3M | +$80M-$81M | +$207M-$224M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CATH ILCB | +11.91%+12.04% | +18.58%+18.45% | +15.11%+15.01% | +17.48%+17.16% |
| Max drawdown | CATH ILCB | -3.65%-3.47% | -13.72%-13.93% | -19.35%-19.10% | -26.22%-25.46% |
| Max drawdown duration | CATH ILCB | 57d42d | 45d45d | 126d126d | 713d715d |
CATH | ILCB | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.08 | $93.44 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $81.14 | $93.53 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CATH | ILCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CATH | ILCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.08 | $93.44 |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $1.12 B | $1.15 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.03% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CATH and ILCB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, CATH is down -1.26% year-to-date (YTD), while ILCB has lost -0.85%. That puts ILCB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CATH or ILCB?
Year-to-date, the CATH ETF saw +$33M in flows, compared to -$19M for ILCB.
Which ETF is more volatile: CATH or ILCB?
Over the past year, CATH had a volatility of 18.58%, while ILCB experienced 18.45%.
Which ETF is bigger: CATH or ILCB?
As of March 10, 2026, CATH holds $1.12 B in assets under management (AUM), while ILCB manages $1.15 B.
What sectors do the CATH and ILCB ETFs invest in?
CATH leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ILCB focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CATH ETF and ILCB ETF?
CATH top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ILCB holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: CATH or ILCB?
CATH holds 444 securities with 44.74% of its assets in the top 15. ILCB has 535 securities and a top 15 weight of 43%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
