CASvsGBILETF Comparison
VS
Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) is part of the Money Market Bonds segment. CAS's top 2 sector exposures are Sovereign and Government Agencies. In contrast, GBIL's top sector exposures are Sovereign. CAS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.88%, versus 0.14% for GBIL. CAS is up 9.76% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. GBIL performs worse with 2.45% YTD performance, and +$1.20B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CAS and GBIL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CAS vs GBIL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CAS GBIL | -3.44%+0.25% | -6.79%+0.86% | +9.76%+2.45% | +15.67%+3.60% | n/a+14.07% | n/a+18.94% |
| Flows | CAS GBIL | +$646K+$267M | +$1M+$99M | +$3M+$1.20B | +$4M+$1.61B | -+$1.88B | -+$5.95B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CAS GBIL | +31.13%+0.19% | +24.30%+0.17% | n/a+0.21% | n/a+0.26% |
| Max drawdown | CAS GBIL | -16.29%n/a | -16.29%-0.00% | n/a-0.00% | n/a-0.30% |
| Max drawdown duration | CAS GBIL | 88dn/a | 88d2d | n/a2d | n/a335d |
Trading data
CAS | GBIL | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.55 | $100.01 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $25.12 | $99.99 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CAS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCAS | GBIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CAS | GBIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.55 | $100.01 |
| 1D performance | +1.70% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $13.33 M | $7.88 B |
| E/R | 0.88% | 0.14% |
Characteristics
CAS | GBIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Simplify | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE U.S. Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index |
| N° of holdings | 128 | 37 |
| Asset class | - | Bonds |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 13, 2025 | September 6, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CAS
USA
92.5%
Other
7.5%
GBIL
USA
90.49%
Other
9.51%
Sectors
CAS
Sovereign
71.37%
Government Agenci.
21.14%
Other
7.5%
GBIL
Sovereign
90.49%
Other
9.51%
Diversification
CAS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
69.65%
GBIL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.81%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CAS
USA, Bills 0% 3dec2026, USD (182D)
28.00%
USA, Bills 0% 1sep2026, USD (119D)
13.74%
USA, Bills 0% 15oct2026, USD (182D)
10.48%
USA, Bills 0% 31dec2026, USD (182D)
7.97%
Freddie Mac, FRN 22sep2027, USD
1.34%
USA, Notes FRN 31jul2026, USD (BF-2026)
1.16%
USA, Notes FRN 31jul2027, USD (BF-2027)
0.93%
FHLB, 0% 7aug2026, USD (365D)
0.93%
FHLB, 0% 21aug2026, USD (365D)
0.93%
FHLB, 0% 27aug2026, USD (365D)
0.93%
FHLB, 0% 3sep2026, USD (365D)
0.74%
USA, Notes FRN 31oct2027, USD (BK-2027)
0.65%
FHLB, 0% 28aug2026, USD (365D)
0.65%
USA, Bills 0% 8oct2026, USD (182D)
0.64%
USA, Notes FRN 30apr2027, USD (BB-2027)
0.59%
GBIL
USA, Bills 0% 22sep2026, USD (119D)
7.65%
USA, Notes 4.125% 31jan2027, USD (AW-2027)
4.63%
USA, Bills 0% 6aug2026, USD (364D)
4.56%
USA, Bills 0% 4aug2026, USD (119D)
4.38%
USA, Bills 0% 18aug2026, USD (119D)
4.29%
USA, Bills 0% 24sep2026, USD (182D)
3.89%
USA, Notes 3.5% 30sep2026, USD (BH-2026)
3.82%
USA, Notes 3.875% 31mar2027, USD (AZ-2027)
3.65%
USA, Notes 3.75% 30apr2027, USD (BA-2027)
3.65%
USA, Bills 0% 25aug2026, USD (119D)
3.41%
USA, Notes 4.125% 28feb2027, USD (AY-2027)
3.31%
USA, Bills 0% 29oct2026, USD (364D)
2.82%
USA, Bills 0% 27nov2026, USD (364D)
2.75%
USA, Notes 4.5% 15may2027, USD (AN-2027)
2.61%
USA, Notes 4.25% 30nov2026, USD (BL-2026)
2.39%
Frequently asked questions about CAS and GBIL
How have the CAS and GBIL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, CAS is up 9.76% year-to-date (YTD), while GBIL has returned 2.45%. That puts CAS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CAS or GBIL?
Year-to-date, the CAS ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to +$1.20B for GBIL.
Which ETF is more volatile: CAS or GBIL?
Over the past year, CAS had a volatility of 24.3%, while GBIL experienced 0.17%.
Which ETF is bigger: CAS or GBIL?
As of September 18, 2026, CAS holds $13.33 M in assets under management (AUM), while GBIL manages $7.88 B.
What sectors do the CAS and GBIL ETFs invest in?
CAS leans toward sectors like Sovereign and Government Agencies. Meanwhile, GBIL focuses on Sovereign.
What are the top holdings of the CAS ETF and GBIL ETF?
CAS top holdings include USA, Bills 0% 3dec2026, USD (182D), USA, Bills 0% 1sep2026, USD (119D) and USA, Bills 0% 15oct2026, USD (182D). GBIL holds in its top three: USA, Bills 0% 22sep2026, USD (119D), USA, Notes 4.125% 31jan2027, USD (AW-2027) and USA, Bills 0% 6aug2026, USD (364D).
Which ETF is more diversified: CAS or GBIL?
CAS holds 170 securities with 69.65% of its assets in the top 15. GBIL has 37 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.81%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CAS & GBIL
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: January 2025
January 30, 2025
CAS
3 Money Market ETFs U.S. investors can use to risk-off
June 21, 2022
GBIL
Advertisement
Advertisement
