Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CAMLvsLRGGETF Comparison
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF (CAML) and Macquarie Focused Large Growth ETF (LRGG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. CAML's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials. In contrast, LRGG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. CAML is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.45% for LRGG. CAML is down -6.37% year-to-date (YTD) with +$14M in YTD flows. LRGG performs worse with -9.23% YTD performance, and -$51M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CAML and LRGG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CAML vs LRGG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CAML LRGG | -3.76%-0.48% | -5.77%-8.75% | -6.37%-9.23% | +14.35%+3.95% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | CAML LRGG | +$11M-$33M | +$16M-$50M | +$14M-$51M | +$48M+$246M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CAML LRGG | +14.39%+15.23% | +20.15%+18.18% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CAML LRGG | -7.99%-11.31% | -14.31%-13.48% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CAML LRGG | 66d73d | 37d134d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
CAML | LRGG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.76 | $26.26 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $36.11 | $26.39 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
CAML | LRGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.76 | $26.26 |
| 1D performance | -0.97% | -0.49% |
| AuM | $330.07 M | $297.34 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.45% |
CAML | LRGG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Congress Asset Management | Macquarie |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 36 | 23 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 22, 2023 | May 15, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CAML and LRGG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, CAML is down -6.37% year-to-date (YTD), while LRGG has lost -9.23%. That puts CAML better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CAML or LRGG?
Year-to-date, the CAML ETF saw +$14M in flows, compared to -$51M for LRGG.
Which ETF is more volatile: CAML or LRGG?
Over the past year, CAML had a volatility of 20.15%, while LRGG experienced 18.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: CAML or LRGG?
As of March 13, 2026, CAML holds $330.07 M in assets under management (AUM), while LRGG manages $297.34 M.
What sectors do the CAML and LRGG ETFs invest in?
CAML leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials. Meanwhile, LRGG focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the CAML ETF and LRGG ETF?
CAML top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. LRGG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: CAML or LRGG?
CAML holds 38 securities with 53.78% of its assets in the top 15. LRGG has 23 securities and a top 15 weight of 86.95%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
