CAMvsCGHMETF Comparison
VS
AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. CAM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.27%, versus 0.34% for CGHM. CAM is down -0.79% year-to-date (YTD) with +$109M in YTD flows. CGHM performs worse with -1.27% YTD performance, and +$1.21B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CAM and CGHM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CAM vs CGHM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CAM CGHM | -0.26%-0.63% | -1.99%-3.99% | -0.79%-1.27% | -0.20%-0.65% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | CAM CGHM | +$6M+$300M | +$20M+$501M | +$109M+$1.21B | +$128M+$1.42B | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CAM CGHM | +3.36%+5.57% | +2.16%+3.65% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CAM CGHM | -3.68%-6.27% | -4.26%-6.96% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CAM CGHM | 64d92d | 229d110d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
CAM | CGHM | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.34 | $24.42 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $24.31 | $24.43 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CAM | CGHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.34 | $24.42 |
| 1D performance | +0.12% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $1.19 B | $3.56 B |
| E/R | 0.27% | 0.34% |
Characteristics
CAM | CGHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AllianceBernstein | Capital Group |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 138 | 845 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 3, 2025 | June 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CAM
USA
42.69%
Other
57.31%
CGHM
USA
45.11%
Other
54.89%
Sectors
CAM
Municipal
42.69%
Other
57.31%
CGHM
Municipal
45.11%
Other
54.89%
Advertisement
Diversification
CAM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.47%
CGHM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.41%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
CAM
City of Los Angeles, 5% 24jun2027, USD (2026)
3.35%
City of San Diego, 5% 30jun2027, USD (2026)
2.93%
US544657JD25
2.51%
US13013JCM62
1.46%
US13013JDB98
1.43%
US13034A7F19
1.33%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1jan2056, USD (2024H)
1.25%
US79766DWM72
1.16%
US544446BT39
1.14%
Bay Area Toll Authority, 3.54% 1apr2056, USD (2021)
1.09%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1nov2055, USD (2024G)
1.08%
US769110DA28
1.03%
San Francisco Airport Commission, 5% 1may2034, USD (2019A)
0.94%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1feb2055, USD (2024D)
0.88%
US79739GRG37
0.88%
CGHM
Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2043, USD
1.31%
Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2051, USD
0.86%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 4.329% 1jul2040, USD
0.61%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 0% 1jul2046, USD (10001D)
0.53%
US419800PW17
0.50%
Chicago Board of Education, 5% 1dec2042, USD (2012A)
0.44%
Arkansas Development Finance Authority, 4% 1sep2046, USD (2026A)
0.43%
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, 5% 1jul2047, USD (2020A)
0.42%
City of New York, FRN 1apr2042, USD
0.35%
Capital Trust Agency, 5% 1jul2056, USD (2021A-1)
0.34%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1jun2036, USD (2026)
0.33%
US45203HAH57
0.33%
US83703FLR19
0.33%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 5% 1jun2034, USD (2026)
0.32%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 5% 1oct2040, USD (2020)
0.31%
Frequently asked questions about CAM and CGHM
How have the CAM and CGHM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, CAM is down -0.79% year-to-date (YTD), while CGHM has lost -1.27%. That puts CAM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CAM or CGHM?
Year-to-date, the CAM ETF saw +$109M in flows, compared to +$1.21B for CGHM.
Which ETF is more volatile: CAM or CGHM?
Over the past year, CAM had a volatility of 2.16%, while CGHM experienced 3.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: CAM or CGHM?
As of October 16, 2026, CAM holds $1.19 B in assets under management (AUM), while CGHM manages $3.56 B.
What sectors do the CAM and CGHM ETFs invest in?
CAM leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, CGHM focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the CAM ETF and CGHM ETF?
CAM top holdings include City of Los Angeles, 5% 24jun2027, USD (2026), City of San Diego, 5% 30jun2027, USD (2026) and US544657JD25. CGHM holds in its top three: Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2043, USD, Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2051, USD and Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 4.329% 1jul2040, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: CAM or CGHM?
CAM holds 419 securities with 22.47% of its assets in the top 15. CGHM has 2608 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.41%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
