CAMvsBSMZETF Comparison
VS
AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM) and Invesco BulletShares 2035 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMZ) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. CAM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.27%, versus 0.18% for BSMZ. CAM is up 0.78% year-to-date (YTD) with +$105M in YTD flows. BSMZ performs worse with -1.16% YTD performance, and +$40M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CAM and BSMZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CAM vs BSMZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CAM BSMZ | +0.21%-1.25% | -0.39%-2.48% | +0.78%-1.16% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | CAM BSMZ | +$5M+$10M | +$55M+$18M | +$105M+$40M | -- | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CAM BSMZ | +1.58%+3.29% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | CAM BSMZ | -1.25%-3.51% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CAM BSMZ | 56d57d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
CAM | BSMZ | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.66 | $24.53 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $24.68 | $24.58 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CAM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCAM | BSMZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CAM | BSMZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.66 | $24.53 |
| 1D performance | -0.10% | -0.21% |
| AuM | $1.21 B | $63.67 M |
| E/R | 0.27% | 0.18% |
Characteristics
CAM | BSMZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AllianceBernstein | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2035 Index |
| N° of holdings | 140 | 417 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 3, 2025 | September 17, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CAM
USA
43.58%
Other
56.42%
BSMZ
USA
41.76%
Other
58.24%
Sectors
CAM
Municipal
43.58%
Other
56.42%
BSMZ
Municipal
41.76%
Other
58.24%
Advertisement
Diversification
CAM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.01%
BSMZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.75%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CAM
City of Los Angeles, 5% 24jun2027, USD (2026)
3.42%
City of San Diego, 5% 30jun2027, USD (2026)
3.00%
US544657JD25
2.57%
US13013JCM62
1.49%
US13013JDB98
1.47%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1jan2055, USD (2024B)
1.45%
US13034A7F19
1.36%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1jan2056, USD (2024H)
1.26%
US79766DWM72
1.18%
Bay Area Toll Authority, 3.54% 1apr2056, USD (2021)
1.12%
US769110DA28
1.05%
San Francisco Airport Commission, 5% 1may2034, USD (2019A)
0.96%
US79739GRG37
0.90%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1feb2055, USD (2024D)
0.90%
US79766DWW54
0.89%
BSMZ
New York Liberty Development Corp., 5.25% 1oct2035, USD (2005)
0.84%
New York Thruway Authority, 5% 15mar2055, USD (2025B)
0.55%
Massachusetts School Building Authority, 5% 15feb2055, USD (2025)
0.55%
California, 5% 1aug2043, USD
0.53%
Chicago O'Hare International Airport, 5.25% 1jan2061, USD (2026A)
0.53%
City of New York, 5.25% 1feb2050, USD (2025)
0.53%
Minnesota, 5% 1aug2037, USD (2025A)
0.52%
US60637AYQ92
0.51%
US662903J879
0.50%
California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, 5.25% 15may2059, USD (2025)
0.48%
US803301DZ09
0.47%
California, 5% 1mar2055, USD
0.46%
Omaha Public Facilities Corp., 5% 15apr2050, USD (2025C)
0.46%
New York Transitional Finance Authority, 5.5% 1may2050, USD (2026)
0.43%
Texas Water Development Board, 5% 15oct2042, USD (2025)
0.42%
Frequently asked questions about CAM and BSMZ
How have the CAM and BSMZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 31, 2026, CAM is up 0.78% year-to-date (YTD), while BSMZ has lost -1.16%. That puts CAM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CAM or BSMZ?
Year-to-date, the CAM ETF saw +$105M in flows, compared to +$40M for BSMZ.
Which ETF is bigger: CAM or BSMZ?
As of August 31, 2026, CAM holds $1.21 B in assets under management (AUM), while BSMZ manages $63.67 M.
What sectors do the CAM and BSMZ ETFs invest in?
CAM leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, BSMZ focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the CAM ETF and BSMZ ETF?
CAM top holdings include City of Los Angeles, 5% 24jun2027, USD (2026), City of San Diego, 5% 30jun2027, USD (2026) and US544657JD25. BSMZ holds in its top three: New York Liberty Development Corp., 5.25% 1oct2035, USD (2005), New York Thruway Authority, 5% 15mar2055, USD (2025B) and Massachusetts School Building Authority, 5% 15feb2055, USD (2025).
Which ETF is more diversified: CAM or BSMZ?
CAM holds 416 securities with 23.01% of its assets in the top 15. BSMZ has 1381 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.75%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
