CAFGvsXSHQETF Comparison
VS
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CAFG's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, XSHQ's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. CAFG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.29% for XSHQ. CAFG is up 28.92% year-to-date (YTD) with +$23M in YTD flows. XSHQ performs worse with 10.2% YTD performance, and +$40M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CAFG and XSHQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CAFG vs XSHQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CAFG XSHQ | -4.23%-6.75% | +1.55%-0.35% | +28.92%+10.20% | +26.91%+7.44% | +56.09%+32.86% | n/a+36.08% |
| Flows | CAFG XSHQ | -+$6M | +$21M-$367K | +$23M+$40M | +$21M+$9M | +$37M+$240M | -+$252M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CAFG XSHQ | +12.63%+13.98% | +16.83%+16.40% | +19.34%+19.75% | n/a+20.84% |
| Max drawdown | CAFG XSHQ | -6.67%-7.67% | -8.08%-9.75% | -23.47%-27.13% | n/a-27.13% |
| Max drawdown duration | CAFG XSHQ | 44d44d | 109d118d | 435d562d | n/a562d |
Trading data
CAFG | XSHQ | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.33 | $45.91 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $32.67 | $46.25 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CAFG | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CAFG | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.33 | $45.91 |
| 1D performance | -1.03% | -0.73% |
| AuM | $44.89 M | $307.21 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.29% |
Characteristics
CAFG | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 119 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 1, 2023 | April 6, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CAFG
USA
98.36%
Other
1.64%
XSHQ
USA
96.5%
Other
3.5%
Sectors
CAFG
Technology
28.76%
Healthcare
18.79%
Industrials
11.68%
Energy
11.5%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.26%
Other
21.01%
XSHQ
Finance
28.85%
Technology
20.66%
Industrials
16.91%
Other
33.58%
Advertisement
Diversification
CAFG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.54%
XSHQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.57%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CAFG
Iridium Communications, Inc.
4.40%
Liquidia Corp.
2.72%
Power Integrations, Inc.
2.68%
Powell Industries, Inc.
2.64%
Adeia, Inc.
2.35%
RingCentral, Inc.
2.31%
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.
2.18%
A10 Networks, Inc.
1.88%
Dorian LPG Ltd.
1.86%
SM Energy Co.
1.83%
Clear Secure, Inc.
1.82%
Pitney Bowes, Inc.
1.82%
Digi International, Inc.
1.75%
Argan, Inc.
1.69%
OPENLANE, Inc.
1.61%
XSHQ
Paycom Software, Inc.
2.59%
Brinker International, Inc.
2.54%
Argan, Inc.
2.49%
Clear Secure, Inc.
2.40%
Dave, Inc.
2.18%
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
2.14%
Lyft, Inc.
1.86%
Moelis & Co.
1.83%
PJT Partners, Inc.
1.79%
Qorvo, Inc.
1.72%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
1.68%
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
1.62%
Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc.
1.60%
Frontdoor, Inc.
1.56%
MYR Group, Inc.
1.56%
Frequently asked questions about CAFG and XSHQ
How have the CAFG and XSHQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, CAFG is up 28.92% year-to-date (YTD), while XSHQ has returned 10.2%. That puts CAFG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CAFG or XSHQ?
Year-to-date, the CAFG ETF saw +$23M in flows, compared to +$40M for XSHQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: CAFG or XSHQ?
Over the past year, CAFG had a volatility of 16.83%, while XSHQ experienced 16.4%.
Which ETF is bigger: CAFG or XSHQ?
As of September 17, 2026, CAFG holds $44.89 M in assets under management (AUM), while XSHQ manages $307.21 M.
What sectors do the CAFG and XSHQ ETFs invest in?
CAFG leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, XSHQ focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CAFG ETF and XSHQ ETF?
CAFG top holdings include Iridium Communications, Inc., Liquidia Corp. and Power Integrations, Inc.. XSHQ holds in its top three: Paycom Software, Inc., Brinker International, Inc. and Argan, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CAFG or XSHQ?
CAFG holds 100 securities with 33.54% of its assets in the top 15. XSHQ has 119 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.57%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
