Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BWVTFvsXYLGETF Comparison
iPath CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index ETN (BWVTF) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. BWVTF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.35% for XYLG. BWVTF is up 1.46% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. XYLG performs worse with 0.32% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BWVTF and XYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BWVTF vs XYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BWVTF XYLG | -0.24%-1.21% | +2.80%+0.63% | +1.46%+0.32% | +15.08%+18.15% | +46.92%+61.54% | +52.42%+65.22% |
| Flows | BWVTF XYLG | --$276K | -+$5M | -+$2M | -$715K+$1M | -$900K+$8M | -$1M+$64M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BWVTF XYLG | +7.53%+9.25% | +15.14%+15.74% | +11.12%+12.19% | +12.21%+13.93% |
| Max drawdown | BWVTF XYLG | -1.82%-2.31% | -11.76%-12.29% | -16.79%-17.16% | -19.88%-21.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | BWVTF XYLG | 12d13d | 91d48d | 240d154d | 686d736d |
BWVTF | XYLG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.28 | |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $27.29 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BWVTF | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BWVTF | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $27.28 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.04% |
| AuM | $1.56 M | $64.19 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BWVTF and XYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, BWVTF is up 1.46% year-to-date (YTD), while XYLG has returned 0.32%. That puts BWVTF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BWVTF or XYLG?
Year-to-date, the BWVTF ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$2M for XYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: BWVTF or XYLG?
Over the past year, BWVTF had a volatility of 15.14%, while XYLG experienced 15.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: BWVTF or XYLG?
As of March 10, 2026, BWVTF holds $1.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while XYLG manages $64.19 M.
What sectors do the BWVTF and XYLG ETFs invest in?
BWVTF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, XYLG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the BWVTF ETF and XYLG ETF?
BWVTF top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. XYLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: BWVTF or XYLG?
BWVTF holds 503 securities with 44.54% of its assets in the top 15. XYLG has 502 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.33%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
