Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BWVTFvsXTRETF Comparison
iPath CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index ETN (BWVTF) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. BWVTF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.25% for XTR. BWVTF is up 0.1% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. XTR performs worse with -3.25% YTD performance, and +$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BWVTF and XTR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BWVTF vs XTR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BWVTF XTR | -0.56%-3.10% | +1.36%-2.98% | +0.10%-3.25% | +13.87%+17.01% | +45.20%+62.98% | +49.00%n/a |
| Flows | BWVTF XTR | -- | -+$1M | -+$1M | -$715K+$2M | -$900K-$340K | -$1M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BWVTF XTR | +8.08%+10.63% | +15.18%+13.34% | +11.14%+12.24% | +12.23%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BWVTF XTR | -2.38%-4.94% | -11.76%-8.71% | -16.79%-14.42% | -19.88%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BWVTF XTR | 14d45d | 91d45d | 240d132d | 686dn/a |
BWVTF | XTR | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.56 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.73 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BWVTF | XTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BWVTF | XTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $25.56 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.64% |
| AuM | $1.54 M | $3.07 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.25% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BWVTF and XTR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, BWVTF is up 0.1% year-to-date (YTD), while XTR has lost -3.25%. That puts BWVTF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BWVTF or XTR?
Year-to-date, the BWVTF ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$1M for XTR.
Which ETF is more volatile: BWVTF or XTR?
Over the past year, BWVTF had a volatility of 15.18%, while XTR experienced 13.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: BWVTF or XTR?
As of March 12, 2026, BWVTF holds $1.54 M in assets under management (AUM), while XTR manages $3.07 M.
What sectors do the BWVTF and XTR ETFs invest in?
BWVTF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, XTR focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the BWVTF ETF and XTR ETF?
BWVTF top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. XTR holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: BWVTF or XTR?
BWVTF holds 503 securities with 44.54% of its assets in the top 15. XTR has 501 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.88%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
