BWVTFvsXRMIETF Comparison
iPath CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index ETN (BWVTF) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. BWVTF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.6% for XRMI. BWVTF is up 7.21% year-to-date (YTD) with -$126K in YTD flows. XRMI performs worse with 3.09% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BWVTF and XRMI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BWVTF vs XRMI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BWVTF XRMI | +2.40%+1.69% | +5.32%+3.26% | +7.21%+3.09% | +18.07%+9.56% | +41.16%+21.86% | +48.88%n/a |
| Flows | BWVTF XRMI | -- | -+$866K | -$126K+$8M | -$841K+$6M | -$936K+$28M | -$1M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BWVTF XRMI | +6.76%+4.75% | +7.57%+5.19% | +11.20%+5.75% | +12.30%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BWVTF XRMI | -2.20%-1.64% | -5.71%-5.05% | -16.79%-7.98% | -19.88%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BWVTF XRMI | 8d8d | 62d91d | 240d274d | 686dn/a |
BWVTF | XRMI | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $17.16 | |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $17.14 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BWVTF | XRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BWVTF | XRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $17.16 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.11% |
| AuM | $1.52 M | $49.63 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.6% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
