Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BWVTFvsXCLRETF Comparison
iPath CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index ETN (BWVTF) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. BWVTF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.25% for XCLR. BWVTF is up 0.1% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. XCLR performs worse with -2.63% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BWVTF and XCLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BWVTF vs XCLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BWVTF XCLR | -0.56%-2.41% | +1.36%-2.54% | +0.10%-2.63% | +13.87%+11.87% | +45.20%+50.89% | +49.00%n/a |
| Flows | BWVTF XCLR | -- | -- | -- | -$715K+$234K | -$900K-$1M | -$1M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BWVTF XCLR | +8.08%+9.16% | +15.18%+10.37% | +11.14%+10.16% | +12.23%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BWVTF XCLR | -2.38%-4.11% | -11.76%-6.24% | -16.79%-12.48% | -19.88%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BWVTF XCLR | 14d43d | 91d45d | 240d153d | 686dn/a |
BWVTF | XCLR | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.23 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.57 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BWVTF | XCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BWVTF | XCLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $26.23 |
| 1D performance | – | -1.26% |
| AuM | $1.54 M | $3.15 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.25% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BWVTF and XCLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, BWVTF is up 0.1% year-to-date (YTD), while XCLR has lost -2.63%. That puts BWVTF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BWVTF or XCLR?
Year-to-date, the BWVTF ETF saw - in flows, compared to - for XCLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: BWVTF or XCLR?
Over the past year, BWVTF had a volatility of 15.18%, while XCLR experienced 10.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: BWVTF or XCLR?
As of March 12, 2026, BWVTF holds $1.54 M in assets under management (AUM), while XCLR manages $3.15 M.
What sectors do the BWVTF and XCLR ETFs invest in?
BWVTF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, XCLR focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the BWVTF ETF and XCLR ETF?
BWVTF top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. XCLR holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: BWVTF or XCLR?
BWVTF holds 503 securities with 44.54% of its assets in the top 15. XCLR has 501 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.68%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
