Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BUGvsSPAMETF Comparison
Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) belong to the same industry segment: Cybersecurity. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Information Technology. BUG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.51%, versus 0.35% for SPAM. BUG is down -12.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$20M in YTD flows. SPAM performs better with -1.86% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BUG and SPAM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BUG vs SPAM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BUG SPAM | -4.68%-1.11% | -15.16%-4.92% | -12.81%-1.86% | -16.28%+4.92% | +23.20%n/a | +3.31%n/a |
| Flows | BUG SPAM | +$3M- | -$12M- | +$20M- | +$170M+$682K | +$71M- | +$223M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BUG SPAM | +29.20%+27.39% | +26.31%+24.86% | +23.34%n/a | +26.98%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BUG SPAM | -22.90%-14.49% | -34.94%-23.70% | -34.94%n/a | -41.52%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BUG SPAM | 81d45d | 247d155d | 247dn/a | 1120dn/a |
BUG | SPAM | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.53 | $30.02 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.48 | $29.79 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BUG | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BUG | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.53 | $30.02 |
| 1D performance | +0.19% | +0.77% |
| AuM | $844.55 M | $2.40 M |
| E/R | 0.51% | 0.35% |
BUG | SPAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Themes Management Company |
| Benchmark | Indxx Cybersecurity Index | Solactive Cybersecurity Index |
| N° of holdings | 26 | 30 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 25, 2019 | December 8, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BUG and SPAM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, BUG is down -12.81% year-to-date (YTD), while SPAM has lost -1.86%. That puts SPAM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BUG or SPAM?
Year-to-date, the BUG ETF saw +$20M in flows, compared to - for SPAM.
Which ETF is more volatile: BUG or SPAM?
Over the past year, BUG had a volatility of 26.31%, while SPAM experienced 24.86%.
Which ETF is bigger: BUG or SPAM?
As of March 13, 2026, BUG holds $844.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while SPAM manages $2.40 M.
What sectors do the BUG and SPAM ETFs invest in?
BUG leans toward sectors like Information Technology. Meanwhile, SPAM focuses on Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the BUG ETF and SPAM ETF?
BUG top holdings include AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, FORTINET and CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIS. SPAM holds in its top three: AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, CACI INTERNATIONAL and QUALYS.
Which ETF is more diversified: BUG or SPAM?
BUG holds 29 securities with 77.35% of its assets in the top 15. SPAM has 34 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.52%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
