BUFQvsPSFFETF Comparison
FT Vest Fund of Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETFs (BUFQ) and Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. They also belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. BUFQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1%, versus 0.72% for PSFF. BUFQ is up 10.43% year-to-date (YTD) with +$331M in YTD flows. PSFF performs worse with 8.31% YTD performance, and +$14M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BUFQ and PSFF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BUFQ vs PSFF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BUFQ PSFF | +1.73%+0.92% | +0.80%+2.19% | +10.43%+8.31% | +16.57%+12.47% | +54.88%+41.93% | n/a+56.48% |
| Flows | BUFQ PSFF | +$51M+$4M | +$119M+$11M | +$331M+$14M | +$377M+$41M | +$1.07B+$289M | -+$414M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BUFQ PSFF | +9.60%+5.21% | +8.74%+5.12% | +11.36%+7.64% | n/a+8.52% |
| Max drawdown | BUFQ PSFF | -4.09%-1.16% | -5.34%-3.30% | -15.97%-11.01% | n/a-11.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | BUFQ PSFF | 49d8d | 70d41d | 110d125d | n/a125d |
BUFQ | PSFF | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 7:40 PM | $39.83 | $35.13 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $39.60 | $34.97 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BUFQ | PSFF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.83 | $35.13 |
| 1D performance | +0.58% | +0.47% |
| AuM | $1.61 B | $604.68 M |
| E/R | 1% | 0.72% |
BUFQ | PSFF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 1 | 1 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 15, 2022 | December 30, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 4 holdings out of 4
Total weight of top 12 holdings out of 12
