BSSXvsMMCAETF Comparison
VS
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) and NYLI MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF (MMCA) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. BSSX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.7% for MMCA. BSSX is down -2.47% year-to-date (YTD) with +$43M in YTD flows. MMCA performs worse with -2.54% YTD performance, and +$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BSSX and MMCA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BSSX vs MMCA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BSSX MMCA | -0.05%-0.54% | -3.39%-3.25% | -2.47%-2.54% | -1.85%-1.81% | +11.30%+11.12% | n/an/a |
| Flows | BSSX MMCA | +$12M+$9M | +$22M+$11M | +$43M+$33M | +$61M+$43M | +$148M+$67M | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BSSX MMCA | +5.34%+4.73% | +3.41%+2.98% | +4.50%+3.12% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BSSX MMCA | -6.07%-5.42% | -7.19%-6.73% | -7.19%-6.73% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BSSX MMCA | 92d64d | 229d229d | 229d229d | n/an/a |
Trading data
BSSX | MMCA | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.51 | $20.78 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $24.58 | $20.81 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 20, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MMCA
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBSSX | MMCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BSSX | MMCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.51 | $20.78 |
| 1D performance | -0.28% | -0.14% |
| AuM | $149.47 M | $97.66 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.7% |
Characteristics
BSSX | MMCA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | New York Life Investments |
| Benchmark | ICE BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2033 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 473 | 33 |
| Asset class | Fixed Income | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2023 | December 22, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BSSX
USA
35.24%
Other
64.76%
MMCA
USA
31.29%
Other
68.71%
Sectors
BSSX
Municipal
35.24%
Other
64.76%
MMCA
Municipal
31.29%
Other
68.71%
Advertisement
Diversification
BSSX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.6%
MMCA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
26.09%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
BSSX
California, 5.25% 1sep2053, USD
0.51%
County of Jefferson (AL), 5.25% 1oct2045, USD (2024)
0.45%
New York Dormitory Authority, 2% 1jul2033, USD
0.42%
Harris Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., 5% 1dec2033, USD (2026A)
0.40%
US64613CEG96
0.39%
US709225HB54
0.38%
Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 5% 1jul2033, USD
0.38%
US64972JCD81
0.37%
US64613CEH79
0.35%
US472682ZN67
0.34%
US646140ES88
0.34%
US13063CC328
0.32%
US452153HU62
0.32%
California, 5% 1oct2042, USD
0.32%
US64972GE671
0.32%
MMCA
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1oct2034, USD (2026G)
2.63%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5.25% 1feb2036, USD (2026C)
2.22%
US13013JCM62
2.20%
California Public Works Board, 5% 1sep2035, USD (2026)
2.06%
US120827ES50
2.00%
US13077DYV80
1.80%
US544446BN68
1.72%
San Jose (CA), 3.05% 1may2066, USD (2026A)
1.57%
California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, 3.25% 1jun2033, USD (2026)
1.55%
Puerto Rico, 4% 1jul2037, USD
1.52%
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, 0% 15jan2035, USD (2015A, 7270D)
1.49%
California, 5% 1sep2039, USD
1.41%
US13032UWT14
1.33%
US845389PU30
1.30%
US13050WAL54
1.28%
Frequently asked questions about BSSX and MMCA
How have the BSSX and MMCA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, BSSX is down -2.47% year-to-date (YTD), while MMCA has lost -2.54%. That puts BSSX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BSSX or MMCA?
Year-to-date, the BSSX ETF saw +$43M in flows, compared to +$33M for MMCA.
Which ETF is more volatile: BSSX or MMCA?
Over the past year, BSSX had a volatility of 3.41%, while MMCA experienced 2.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: BSSX or MMCA?
As of October 16, 2026, BSSX holds $149.47 M in assets under management (AUM), while MMCA manages $97.66 M.
What sectors do the BSSX and MMCA ETFs invest in?
BSSX leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, MMCA focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the BSSX ETF and MMCA ETF?
BSSX top holdings include California, 5.25% 1sep2053, USD, County of Jefferson (AL), 5.25% 1oct2045, USD (2024) and New York Dormitory Authority, 2% 1jul2033, USD. MMCA holds in its top three: California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1oct2034, USD (2026G), California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5.25% 1feb2036, USD (2026C) and US13013JCM62.
Which ETF is more diversified: BSSX or MMCA?
BSSX holds 1689 securities with 5.6% of its assets in the top 15. MMCA has 120 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.09%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
