BSRvsPTLCETF Comparison
VS
Beacon Unified Catalyst Fund (BSR) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. BSR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.43%, versus 0.6% for PTLC. BSR is up 5.13% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. PTLC performs better with 7.24% YTD performance, and -$257M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BSR and PTLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BSR vs PTLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BSR PTLC | +1.59%+1.45% | +1.52%+1.81% | +5.13%+7.24% | +6.08%+10.87% | +27.79%+50.64% | n/a+59.10% |
| Flows | BSR PTLC | -$924K-$27M | -$2M-$50M | -$6M-$257M | +$801K-$374M | +$1M-$27M | -+$167M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BSR PTLC | +9.86%+11.16% | +9.31%+12.16% | +9.69%+12.29% | n/a+11.95% |
| Max drawdown | BSR PTLC | -3.18%-3.07% | -6.13%-8.81% | -11.04%-15.08% | n/a-15.08% |
| Max drawdown duration | BSR PTLC | 63d53d | 228d98d | 403d247d | n/a247d |
Trading data
BSR | PTLC | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.56 | $59.85 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $30.43 | $59.59 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BSR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBSR | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BSR | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.56 | $59.85 |
| 1D performance | +0.43% | +0.44% |
| AuM | $33.83 M | $3.30 B |
| E/R | 1.43% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
BSR | PTLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Beacon Capital Management | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 18, 2023 | June 11, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BSR
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Sectors
BSR
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
BSR
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
BSR
Data will be available soon
PTLC
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about BSR and PTLC
How have the BSR and PTLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, BSR is up 5.13% year-to-date (YTD), while PTLC has returned 7.24%. That puts PTLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BSR or PTLC?
Year-to-date, the BSR ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to -$257M for PTLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: BSR or PTLC?
Over the past year, BSR had a volatility of 9.31%, while PTLC experienced 12.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: BSR or PTLC?
As of October 15, 2026, BSR holds $33.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while PTLC manages $3.30 B.
Advertisement
Advertisement
