BSMVvsVCRMETF Comparison
VS
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMV) and Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. BSMV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.12% for VCRM. BSMV is down -2.01% year-to-date (YTD) with +$52M in YTD flows. VCRM performs better with -1.33% YTD performance, and +$1.84B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BSMV and VCRM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BSMV vs VCRM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BSMV VCRM | -0.04%-0.38% | -2.42%-3.26% | -2.01%-1.33% | -1.47%-0.75% | +10.53%n/a | -5.74%n/a |
| Flows | BSMV VCRM | +$12M+$677M | +$22M+$905M | +$52M+$1.84B | +$81M+$2.06B | +$179M- | +$207M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BSMV VCRM | +4.61%+5.29% | +2.82%+3.35% | +3.76%n/a | +4.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BSMV VCRM | -5.01%-5.68% | -6.31%-6.33% | -6.31%n/a | -20.33%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BSMV VCRM | 64d92d | 229d102d | 229dn/a | 1753dn/a |
Trading data
BSMV | VCRM | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.22 | $72.58 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $20.20 | $72.68 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 18, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
VCRM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBSMV | VCRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
BSMV | VCRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.22 | $72.58 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | -0.14% |
| AuM | $204.17 M | $2.59 B |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.12% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BSMV
USA
53.32%
Other
46.68%
VCRM
USA
50.9%
Other
49.1%
Sectors
BSMV
Municipal
53.32%
Other
46.68%
VCRM
Municipal
50.9%
Other
49.1%
Diversification
BSMV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.44%
VCRM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.11%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
BSMV
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15may2051, USD (2021A)
0.65%
New Jersey, 4% 1jun2031, USD
0.60%
Illinois Toll Highway Authority, 5% 1jan2045, USD
0.60%
University of California, 5% 15may2046, USD
0.33%
US13032UE388
0.32%
California, 4% 1oct2041, USD
0.32%
California, 5% 1sep2041, USD
0.31%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5% 15aug2002, USD
0.30%
Massachusetts, 5% 1sep2031, USD (2021)
0.30%
US13063DM705
0.29%
US45884AC273
0.29%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15nov2051, USD (2021A)
0.29%
US646140JN47
0.29%
Maryland, 5% 1mar2034, USD
0.28%
New York Dormitory Authority, 5% 1oct2037, USD (2023A)
0.26%
VCRM
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1oct2035, USD (2025)
0.71%
US09182TEC71
0.61%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1aug2052, USD (2022)
0.53%
Jefferson Sales Tax District, 5% 1dec2042, USD (2017B)
0.52%
Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 1jul2042, USD (2021-A)
0.48%
State of Hawaii, 4% 1may2036, USD
0.47%
US625517PJ02
0.46%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1dec2034, USD (2026)
0.45%
PEFA Inc., 5% 1apr2035, USD (2026A)
0.44%
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, 6% 1jan2057, USD (2026B)
0.44%
Energy Southeast, 5% 1sep2033, USD (2025B)
0.42%
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, 5.75% 1jul2062, USD (2023-1, A)
0.41%
US235330AW70
0.40%
US57563WAC29
0.40%
Indiana Finance Authority, 5% 1oct2046, USD (2016A)
0.38%
Frequently asked questions about BSMV and VCRM
How have the BSMV and VCRM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, BSMV is down -2.01% year-to-date (YTD), while VCRM has lost -1.33%. That puts VCRM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BSMV or VCRM?
Year-to-date, the BSMV ETF saw +$52M in flows, compared to +$1.84B for VCRM.
Which ETF is more volatile: BSMV or VCRM?
Over the past year, BSMV had a volatility of 2.82%, while VCRM experienced 3.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: BSMV or VCRM?
As of October 16, 2026, BSMV holds $204.17 M in assets under management (AUM), while VCRM manages $2.59 B.
What sectors do the BSMV and VCRM ETFs invest in?
BSMV leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, VCRM focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the BSMV ETF and VCRM ETF?
BSMV top holdings include Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15may2051, USD (2021A), New Jersey, 4% 1jun2031, USD and Illinois Toll Highway Authority, 5% 1jan2045, USD. VCRM holds in its top three: Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1oct2035, USD (2025), US09182TEC71 and Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1aug2052, USD (2022).
Which ETF is more diversified: BSMV or VCRM?
BSMV holds 1534 securities with 5.44% of its assets in the top 15. VCRM has 2385 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.11%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
