BSMUvsVCRMETF Comparison
VS
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMU) and Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. BSMU is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.12% for VCRM. BSMU is up 0.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$61M in YTD flows. VCRM performs better with 0.93% YTD performance, and +$1.05B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BSMU and VCRM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BSMU vs VCRM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BSMU VCRM | +0.06%-0.07% | -0.24%-0.81% | +0.27%+0.93% | +2.69%+5.46% | +9.84%n/a | -3.92%n/a |
| Flows | BSMU VCRM | +$9M+$57M | +$28M+$254M | +$61M+$1.05B | +$110M+$1.41B | +$234M- | +$280M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BSMU VCRM | +1.60%+2.47% | +1.66%+2.54% | +3.31%n/a | +4.10%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BSMU VCRM | -1.26%-1.88% | -2.15%-2.64% | -4.33%n/a | -18.36%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BSMU VCRM | 53d56d | 180d107d | 261dn/a | 1698dn/a |
Trading data
BSMU | VCRM | |
Last sale 9/1/2026 at 1:46 PM | $21.62 | $74.21 |
| Previous close 08/28/2026 | $21.64 | $74.65 |
| Consolidated volume 08/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
VCRM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexBSMU | VCRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/1/2026 at 1:46 PM
Live
Closed
BSMU | VCRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.62 | $74.21 |
| 1D performance | -0.12% | -0.60% |
| AuM | $283.13 M | $1.85 B |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.12% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BSMU
USA
61.65%
Other
38.35%
VCRM
USA
58.45%
Other
41.55%
Sectors
BSMU
Municipal
61.65%
Other
38.35%
VCRM
Municipal
58.45%
Other
41.55%
Diversification
BSMU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.19%
VCRM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.97%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
BSMU
Los Angeles Unified School District, 4% 1jul2044, USD
0.63%
New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 4.75% 15nov2045, USD (2020C)
0.59%
New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5.25% 15nov2055, USD (2020C)
0.56%
California, 4% 1mar2036, USD
0.53%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 15nov2049, USD (2020A)
0.43%
California, 5% 1mar2035, USD
0.40%
US544532QE75
0.40%
New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 15nov2050, USD (2020C)
0.39%
New York Urban Development Corp., 5% 15mar2047, USD (2020C)
0.38%
US89602HFT95
0.35%
California, 5% 1nov2030, USD
0.33%
City of New York, 5% 1aug2030, USD
0.31%
US91412HWB58
0.31%
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, 5% 15jun2045, USD
0.30%
Miracosta Community College District, 4% 1aug2045, USD
0.30%
VCRM
University of Cincinnati, 5% 1jun2045, USD (2017)
0.83%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1oct2035, USD (2025)
0.74%
Massachusetts, 5% 1jun2047, USD
0.66%
US09182TEC71
0.63%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1aug2052, USD (2022)
0.55%
Chicago O'Hare International Airport, 5% 1jan2047, USD (2016D)
0.55%
Jefferson Sales Tax District, 5% 1dec2042, USD (2017B)
0.54%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1dec2034, USD (2026)
0.47%
PEFA Inc., 5% 1apr2035, USD (2026A)
0.46%
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, 6% 1jan2057, USD (2026B)
0.45%
Wisconsin Public Finance Authority, 5.75% 1jul2062, USD (2023-1, A)
0.43%
Energy Southeast, 5% 1sep2033, USD (2025B)
0.43%
Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, 5% 1jul2043, USD
0.42%
US57563WAC29
0.42%
Grand Parkway Transportation Corp., 5% 1oct2043, USD (2018A)
0.40%
Frequently asked questions about BSMU and VCRM
How have the BSMU and VCRM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 28, 2026, BSMU is up 0.27% year-to-date (YTD), while VCRM has returned 0.93%. That puts VCRM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BSMU or VCRM?
Year-to-date, the BSMU ETF saw +$61M in flows, compared to +$1.05B for VCRM.
Which ETF is more volatile: BSMU or VCRM?
Over the past year, BSMU had a volatility of 1.66%, while VCRM experienced 2.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: BSMU or VCRM?
As of August 28, 2026, BSMU holds $283.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while VCRM manages $1.85 B.
What sectors do the BSMU and VCRM ETFs invest in?
BSMU leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, VCRM focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the BSMU ETF and VCRM ETF?
BSMU top holdings include Los Angeles Unified School District, 4% 1jul2044, USD, New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 4.75% 15nov2045, USD (2020C) and New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5.25% 15nov2055, USD (2020C). VCRM holds in its top three: University of Cincinnati, 5% 1jun2045, USD (2017), Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1oct2035, USD (2025) and Massachusetts, 5% 1jun2047, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: BSMU or VCRM?
BSMU holds 1752 securities with 6.19% of its assets in the top 15. VCRM has 2396 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.97%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
