BSMQvsIBMRETF Comparison
VS
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ) and iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. BSMQ's top 1 sector exposures are Municipal. In contrast, IBMR's top sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. BSMQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.1% for IBMR. BSMQ is up 1.52% year-to-date (YTD) with -$47M in YTD flows. IBMR performs worse with 0.11% YTD performance, and +$140M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BSMQ and IBMR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
BSMQ vs IBMR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BSMQ IBMR | +0.16%+0.17% | +0.32%-0.66% | +1.52%+0.11% | +2.07%+0.60% | +11.60%+13.67% | +2.66%n/a |
| Flows | BSMQ IBMR | -$12M+$24M | -$28M+$51M | -$47M+$140M | -$38M+$214M | +$136M+$508M | +$230M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BSMQ IBMR | +0.66%+2.34% | +0.47%+1.50% | +1.17%+2.39% | +2.01%n/a |
| Max drawdown | BSMQ IBMR | -0.38%-2.47% | -0.38%-2.75% | -1.47%-2.98% | -11.16%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BSMQ IBMR | 44d55d | 44d235d | 68d212d | 1347dn/a |
Trading data
BSMQ | IBMR | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 7:59 PM | $23.43 | $24.97 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $23.48 | $24.96 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
BSMQ | IBMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
BSMQ | IBMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.43 | $24.97 |
| 1D performance | -0.21% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $253.45 M | $508.72 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.1% |
Characteristics
BSMQ | IBMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | ICE BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2026 Index | S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2029 Index |
| N° of holdings | 641 | 820 |
| Asset class | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 13, 2019 | May 9, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
BSMQ
USA
50.89%
Other
49.11%
IBMR
USA
51.44%
Other
48.56%
Sectors
BSMQ
Municipal
50.89%
Other
49.11%
IBMR
Municipal
50.4%
Other
49.6%
Advertisement
Diversification
BSMQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.37%
IBMR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
6.71%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
BSMQ
US451295ZZ58
1.44%
US64972GDC50
1.07%
US160853UL92
0.77%
Maryland Department of Transportation, 5% 1oct2026, USD (2019)
0.64%
US64579FYL11
0.59%
US20775HAA14
0.57%
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, FRN 15jan2048, USD (2018H)
0.54%
US604115CT06
0.54%
US095175VQ53
0.50%
Illinois Toll Highway Authority, 5% 1jan2040, USD
0.47%
US167560SV44
0.47%
US59261AX695
0.46%
US917393CY40
0.44%
US160853MR54
0.44%
Columbus (OH), 5% 1jun2032, USD (2015)
0.43%
IBMR
BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash
1.04%
US13034A5B23
0.74%
US575829PH38
0.55%
New Jersey, 5% 1jun2029, USD
0.52%
Los Angeles Unified School District, 5% 1jul2029, USD (2026)
0.45%
New York Dormitory Authority, 2.5% 1jul1993, USD
0.39%
Houston, 5% 1jul2029, USD (2018B)
0.38%
Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 5% 1jul2029, USD (2017-A)
0.38%
California, 5% 1oct2029, USD
0.34%
Palm Beach School Board, 5% 1aug2029, USD (2018C)
0.34%
US18085PTF17
0.33%
Pennsylvania, 5% 1apr2029, USD (2026)
0.33%
California, 5% 1sep2029, USD
0.33%
US13063EUP95
0.31%
Contra Costa Transportation Authority, 5% 1mar2029, USD (2018B)
0.29%
Frequently asked questions about BSMQ and IBMR
How have the BSMQ and IBMR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 19, 2026, BSMQ is up 1.52% year-to-date (YTD), while IBMR has returned 0.11%. That puts BSMQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BSMQ or IBMR?
Year-to-date, the BSMQ ETF saw -$47M in flows, compared to +$140M for IBMR.
Which ETF is more volatile: BSMQ or IBMR?
Over the past year, BSMQ had a volatility of 0.47%, while IBMR experienced 1.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: BSMQ or IBMR?
As of October 19, 2026, BSMQ holds $253.45 M in assets under management (AUM), while IBMR manages $508.72 M.
What sectors do the BSMQ and IBMR ETFs invest in?
BSMQ leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, IBMR focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the BSMQ ETF and IBMR ETF?
BSMQ top holdings include US451295ZZ58, US64972GDC50 and US160853UL92. IBMR holds in its top three: BlackRock Liquidity MuniCash, US13034A5B23 and US575829PH38.
Which ETF is more diversified: BSMQ or IBMR?
BSMQ holds 1271 securities with 9.37% of its assets in the top 15. IBMR has 1822 securities and a top 15 weight of 6.71%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
