Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BSMCvsVFVAETF Comparison
Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF Shares (VFVA) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. BSMC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. In contrast, VFVA's top sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. BSMC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.71%, versus 0.13% for VFVA. BSMC is up 5.79% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. VFVA performs worse with 0.74% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BSMC and VFVA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BSMC vs VFVA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BSMC VFVA | -4.04%-6.21% | +4.93%-0.71% | +5.79%+0.74% | +24.39%+22.26% | n/a+50.97% | n/a+55.30% |
| Flows | BSMC VFVA | +$5M+$4M | +$17M+$6M | +$8M+$5M | +$38M-$110M | --$47M | -+$325M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BSMC VFVA | +13.18%+14.58% | +18.47%+22.21% | n/a+18.98% | n/a+20.55% |
| Max drawdown | BSMC VFVA | -5.10%-7.45% | -13.89%-16.42% | n/a-23.80% | n/a-23.80% |
| Max drawdown duration | BSMC VFVA | 10d33d | 51d49d | n/a269d | n/a269d |
BSMC | VFVA | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.66 | $133.67 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $35.75 | $134.03 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BSMC | VFVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.66 | $133.67 |
| 1D performance | -0.26% | -0.27% |
| AuM | $156.83 M | $747.44 M |
| E/R | 0.71% | 0.13% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BSMC and VFVA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, BSMC is up 5.79% year-to-date (YTD), while VFVA has returned 0.74%. That puts BSMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BSMC or VFVA?
Year-to-date, the BSMC ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to +$5M for VFVA.
Which ETF is more volatile: BSMC or VFVA?
Over the past year, BSMC had a volatility of 18.47%, while VFVA experienced 22.21%.
Which ETF is bigger: BSMC or VFVA?
As of March 11, 2026, BSMC holds $156.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while VFVA manages $747.44 M.
What sectors do the BSMC and VFVA ETFs invest in?
BSMC leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Information Technology. Meanwhile, VFVA focuses on Financials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the BSMC ETF and VFVA ETF?
BSMC top holdings include IPG PHOTONICS, DRIL QUIP and ELANCO ANIMAL HEALTH INC. VFVA holds in its top three: VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, COMCAST and GENERAL MOTORS.
Which ETF is more diversified: BSMC or VFVA?
BSMC holds 60 securities with 38.07% of its assets in the top 15. VFVA has 610 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.13%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
