BSMCvsSRHQETF Comparison
Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) and SRH U.S. Quality GARP ETF (SRHQ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. BSMC's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Technology. In contrast, SRHQ's top sector exposures are Healthcare, Technology and Finance. BSMC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.71%, versus 0.35% for SRHQ. BSMC is up 19.55% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. SRHQ performs better with 24.92% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BSMC and SRHQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BSMC vs SRHQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BSMC SRHQ | +4.53%+4.95% | +9.34%+12.72% | +19.55%+24.92% | +33.92%+33.82% | n/a+67.69% | n/an/a |
| Flows | BSMC SRHQ | +$855K+$2M | +$1M+$2M | +$9M+$2M | +$25M+$2M | -+$18M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BSMC SRHQ | +13.76%+13.70% | +14.27%+14.82% | n/a+15.76% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BSMC SRHQ | -4.84%-2.83% | -9.01%-6.38% | n/a-18.39% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BSMC SRHQ | 35d17d | 101d40d | n/a303d | n/an/a |
BSMC | SRHQ | |
Last sale 8/5/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.29 | $49.29 |
| Previous close 08/05/2026 | $41.34 | $49.03 |
| Consolidated volume 08/05/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BSMC | SRHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BSMC | SRHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.29 | $49.29 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | +0.53% |
| AuM | $177.25 M | $219.47 M |
| E/R | 0.71% | 0.35% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
