Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BRNYvsGSLCETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) belongs to the US All Cap segment. Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. BRNY's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, GSLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. BRNY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.09% for GSLC. BRNY is down -2.01% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. GSLC performs better with -1.64% YTD performance, and -$289M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BRNY and GSLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BRNY vs GSLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BRNY GSLC | -2.89%-2.50% | -2.47%-2.11% | -2.01%-1.64% | +25.34%+19.29% | +94.60%+75.76% | n/a+79.19% |
| Flows | BRNY GSLC | +$4M+$33M | +$12M-$214M | +$9M-$289M | +$80M-$242M | +$168M-$2.25B | --$3.72B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BRNY GSLC | +13.38%+11.53% | +19.13%+18.03% | +16.52%+14.62% | n/a+16.64% |
| Max drawdown | BRNY GSLC | -5.74%-3.81% | -14.11%-13.56% | -19.27%-18.65% | n/a-24.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | BRNY GSLC | 41d57d | 45d45d | 151d126d | n/a713d |
BRNY | GSLC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.75 | $127.96 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $49.39 | $129.93 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BRNY | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BRNY | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.75 | $127.96 |
| 1D performance | -1.30% | -1.52% |
| AuM | $482.63 M | $14.48 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.09% |
BRNY | GSLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | The Burney Company | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 64 | 405 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 13, 2022 | September 17, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BRNY and GSLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, BRNY is down -2.01% year-to-date (YTD), while GSLC has lost -1.64%. That puts GSLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BRNY or GSLC?
Year-to-date, the BRNY ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to -$289M for GSLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: BRNY or GSLC?
Over the past year, BRNY had a volatility of 19.13%, while GSLC experienced 18.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: BRNY or GSLC?
As of March 11, 2026, BRNY holds $482.63 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSLC manages $14.48 B.
What sectors do the BRNY and GSLC ETFs invest in?
BRNY leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GSLC focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the BRNY ETF and GSLC ETF?
BRNY top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE. GSLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: BRNY or GSLC?
BRNY holds 66 securities with 61.7% of its assets in the top 15. GSLC has 432 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.3%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
