Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BRNYvsCLSEETF Comparison
Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (BRNY) belongs to the US All Cap segment. Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) is part of the Alternatives segment. BRNY's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, CLSE's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. BRNY is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 1.44% for CLSE. BRNY is down -2.36% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. CLSE performs better with 2.25% YTD performance, and +$67M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BRNY and CLSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BRNY vs CLSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BRNY CLSE | -3.58%-0.85% | -2.16%+2.48% | -2.36%+2.25% | +24.42%+33.16% | +91.58%+94.77% | n/an/a |
| Flows | BRNY CLSE | +$4M+$25M | +$12M+$76M | +$9M+$67M | +$80M+$67M | +$168M+$255M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BRNY CLSE | +13.44%+13.58% | +19.13%+14.32% | +16.54%+13.04% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BRNY CLSE | -5.74%-4.46% | -14.11%-8.49% | -19.27%-15.76% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BRNY CLSE | 40d13d | 45d37d | 151d188d | n/an/a |
BRNY | CLSE | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.39 | $28.01 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $49.20 | $28.01 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BRNY | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.39 | $28.01 |
| 1D performance | +0.38% | +0.01% |
| AuM | $480.93 M | $340.58 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 1.44% |
BRNY | CLSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | The Burney Company | Convergence Investment Partners LLC |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 64 | 624 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 13, 2022 | February 22, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BRNY and CLSE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, BRNY is down -2.36% year-to-date (YTD), while CLSE has returned 2.25%. That puts CLSE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BRNY or CLSE?
Year-to-date, the BRNY ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to +$67M for CLSE.
Which ETF is more volatile: BRNY or CLSE?
Over the past year, BRNY had a volatility of 19.13%, while CLSE experienced 14.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: BRNY or CLSE?
As of March 10, 2026, BRNY holds $480.93 M in assets under management (AUM), while CLSE manages $340.58 M.
What sectors do the BRNY and CLSE ETFs invest in?
BRNY leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, CLSE focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the BRNY ETF and CLSE ETF?
BRNY top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE. CLSE holds in its top three: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, NVIDIA and US5128073062.
Which ETF is more diversified: BRNY or CLSE?
BRNY holds 66 securities with 61.7% of its assets in the top 15. CLSE has 666 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.51%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
