Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BMVPvsLGLVETF Comparison
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF (BMVP) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) is part of the US Low Volatility segment. BMVP's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, LGLV's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. BMVP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.12% for LGLV. BMVP is up 4.95% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1M in YTD flows. LGLV performs worse with 3.73% YTD performance, and +$11M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BMVP and LGLV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BMVP vs LGLV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BMVP LGLV | -2.51%-1.76% | +3.04%+3.56% | +4.95%+3.73% | +10.86%+8.93% | +52.70%+47.55% | +40.31%+62.59% |
| Flows | BMVP LGLV | -+$30M | -$1M-$5M | -$1M+$11M | -$16M+$190M | -$22M+$256M | -$50M+$336M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BMVP LGLV | +10.61%+8.44% | +14.35%+12.81% | +12.52%+11.02% | +16.47%+13.01% |
| Max drawdown | BMVP LGLV | -3.25%-3.84% | -11.10%-9.65% | -15.00%-10.12% | -26.49%-17.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | BMVP LGLV | 31d9d | 43d43d | 374d166d | 799d713d |
BMVP | LGLV | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $50.86 | $180.92 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $51.20 | $182.13 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BMVP | LGLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BMVP | LGLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.86 | $180.92 |
| 1D performance | -0.66% | -0.66% |
| AuM | $102.43 M | $1.16 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.12% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BMVP and LGLV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, BMVP is up 4.95% year-to-date (YTD), while LGLV has returned 3.73%. That puts BMVP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BMVP or LGLV?
Year-to-date, the BMVP ETF saw -$1M in flows, compared to +$11M for LGLV.
Which ETF is more volatile: BMVP or LGLV?
Over the past year, BMVP had a volatility of 14.35%, while LGLV experienced 12.81%.
Which ETF is bigger: BMVP or LGLV?
As of March 11, 2026, BMVP holds $102.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while LGLV manages $1.16 B.
What sectors do the BMVP and LGLV ETFs invest in?
BMVP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, LGLV focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the BMVP ETF and LGLV ETF?
BMVP top holdings include HALLIBURTON, LOCKHEED MARTIN and HOME DEPOT. LGLV holds in its top three: JOHNSON&JOHNSON, VULCAN MATERIALS and WALMART INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: BMVP or LGLV?
BMVP holds 56 securities with 28.68% of its assets in the top 15. LGLV has 166 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.6%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
