Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BMVPvsIMCVETF Comparison
Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF (BMVP) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF (IMCV) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. BMVP's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. In contrast, IMCV's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Energy. BMVP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.06% for IMCV. BMVP is up 5.16% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1M in YTD flows. IMCV performs worse with 4.03% YTD performance, and +$40M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BMVP and IMCV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BMVP vs IMCV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BMVP IMCV | -2.61%-3.31% | +4.11%+3.53% | +5.16%+4.03% | +9.35%+18.73% | +51.09%+51.06% | +44.04%+56.16% |
| Flows | BMVP IMCV | -+$27M | -$1M+$47M | -$1M+$40M | -$16M+$231M | -$22M+$252M | -$50M+$314M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BMVP IMCV | +10.72%+11.70% | +14.44%+17.14% | +12.55%+14.68% | +16.50%+16.70% |
| Max drawdown | BMVP IMCV | -3.06%-4.17% | -11.10%-13.19% | -15.00%-18.64% | -26.49%-19.72% |
| Max drawdown duration | BMVP IMCV | 30d12d | 43d43d | 374d269d | 799d602d |
BMVP | IMCV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.20 | $85.39 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $51.30 | $85.56 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BMVP | IMCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BMVP | IMCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.20 | $85.39 |
| 1D performance | -0.19% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $102.63 M | $983.91 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.06% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BMVP and IMCV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, BMVP is up 5.16% year-to-date (YTD), while IMCV has returned 4.03%. That puts BMVP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BMVP or IMCV?
Year-to-date, the BMVP ETF saw -$1M in flows, compared to +$40M for IMCV.
Which ETF is more volatile: BMVP or IMCV?
Over the past year, BMVP had a volatility of 14.44%, while IMCV experienced 17.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: BMVP or IMCV?
As of March 10, 2026, BMVP holds $102.63 M in assets under management (AUM), while IMCV manages $983.91 M.
What sectors do the BMVP and IMCV ETFs invest in?
BMVP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Financials. Meanwhile, IMCV focuses on Financials, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the BMVP ETF and IMCV ETF?
BMVP top holdings include HALLIBURTON, LOCKHEED MARTIN and HOME DEPOT. IMCV holds in its top three: NEWMONT CORP, PNC FINL SVC and US.
Which ETF is more diversified: BMVP or IMCV?
BMVP holds 56 securities with 28.68% of its assets in the top 15. IMCV has 275 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.13%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
