Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BMEDvsFHLCETF Comparison
iShares Health Innovation Active ETF (BMED) belongs to the Healthcare Technology segment. Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) is part of the US Health Care segment. BMED's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FHLC's top sector exposures are Health Care BMED is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.77%, versus 0.08% for FHLC. BMED is down -5.49% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. FHLC performs better with -3.62% YTD performance, and +$111M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BMED and FHLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BMED vs FHLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BMED FHLC | -6.03%-3.62% | -5.68%-3.11% | -5.49%-3.62% | +16.79%+7.04% | +27.36%+25.79% | -1.83%+31.14% |
| Flows | BMED FHLC | +$1M+$34M | +$4M+$130M | +$4M+$111M | +$7M-$3M | +$4M-$619M | +$5M-$224M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BMED FHLC | +15.26%+13.62% | +17.92%+17.37% | +15.51%+13.71% | +17.58%+14.82% |
| Max drawdown | BMED FHLC | -10.40%-6.70% | -14.01%-11.86% | -19.76%-16.88% | -33.96%-17.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | BMED FHLC | 50d64d | 113d190d | 237d435d | 1586d762d |
BMED | FHLC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.63 | $71.40 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $28.78 | $71.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BMED | FHLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BMED | FHLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.63 | $71.40 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -0.27% |
| AuM | $10.31 M | $2.84 B |
| E/R | 0.77% | 0.08% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BMED and FHLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, BMED is down -5.49% year-to-date (YTD), while FHLC has lost -3.62%. That puts FHLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BMED or FHLC?
Year-to-date, the BMED ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$111M for FHLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: BMED or FHLC?
Over the past year, BMED had a volatility of 17.92%, while FHLC experienced 17.37%.
Which ETF is bigger: BMED or FHLC?
As of March 13, 2026, BMED holds $10.31 M in assets under management (AUM), while FHLC manages $2.84 B.
What sectors do the BMED and FHLC ETFs invest in?
BMED leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, FHLC focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the BMED ETF and FHLC ETF?
BMED top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON, GILEAD SCIENCES and EXACT SCIENCES. FHLC holds in its top three: LILLY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and ABBVIE.
Which ETF is more diversified: BMED or FHLC?
BMED holds 144 securities with 38.18% of its assets in the top 15. FHLC has 328 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.98%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
