BLUXvsEDGUETF Comparison
Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and 3EDGE Dynamic US Equity ETF (EDGU) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. BLUX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.28%, versus 0.91% for EDGU. BLUX is up 13.27% year-to-date (YTD) with +$155M in YTD flows. EDGU performs worse with 10.71% YTD performance, and +$50M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BLUX and EDGU below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BLUX vs EDGU performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BLUX EDGU | +0.48%+0.00% | -0.60%+1.36% | +13.27%+10.71% | +14.76%+10.57% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | BLUX EDGU | +$22M+$1M | +$54M-$51M | +$155M+$50M | +$177M+$44M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BLUX EDGU | +10.85%+10.36% | +13.87%+12.88% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BLUX EDGU | -5.74%-3.81% | -9.09%-7.05% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BLUX EDGU | 75d78d | 63d64d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
BLUX | EDGU | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $31.47 | $31.39 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $31.49 | $31.41 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BLUX | EDGU | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.47 | $31.39 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.05% |
| AuM | $619.67 M | $100.50 M |
| E/R | 0.28% | 0.91% |
BLUX | EDGU | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Bluemonte Investment Management | 3EDGE Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 1 | 2 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2025 | October 3, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 4 holdings out of 4
Total weight of top 14 holdings out of 14
