BLDGvsSRETETF Comparison
Cambria Global real Estate ETF (BLDG) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF - USD (SRET) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Finance. BLDG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.58% for SRET. BLDG is up 14.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. SRET performs worse with 10% YTD performance, and +$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BLDG and SRET below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BLDG vs SRET performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BLDG SRET | +3.92%+3.06% | +7.23%+3.49% | +14.48%+10.00% | +15.32%+16.09% | +31.40%+28.88% | +22.21%+15.17% |
| Flows | BLDG SRET | -- | +$13M-$3M | +$15M+$13M | +$23M+$31M | +$40M-$28M | +$53M-$168M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BLDG SRET | +12.20%+12.56% | +10.67%+11.28% | +12.95%+13.99% | +14.31%+15.48% |
| Max drawdown | BLDG SRET | -2.50%-3.41% | -9.19%-9.55% | -17.36%-18.36% | -25.43%-29.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | BLDG SRET | 11d46d | 68d49d | 345d140d | 904d1447d |
BLDG | SRET | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.80 | $23.00 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $27.45 | $22.78 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BLDG | SRET | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BLDG | SRET | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.80 | $23.00 |
| 1D performance | +1.25% | +0.97% |
| AuM | $67.75 M | $236.36 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.58% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15