Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BKMCvsIWRETF Comparison
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF (IWR) belong to the same industry segment: US Mid Cap. BKMC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. In contrast, IWR's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. BKMC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.18% for IWR. BKMC is up 3.69% year-to-date (YTD) with -$40M in YTD flows. IWR performs worse with 2.81% YTD performance, and +$285M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BKMC and IWR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BKMC vs IWR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BKMC IWR | -4.65%-3.17% | +2.07%+0.56% | +3.69%+2.81% | +20.28%+19.26% | +50.47%+54.13% | +46.66%+42.47% |
| Flows | BKMC IWR | -$26M+$642M | -$33M+$778M | -$40M+$285M | +$24M+$4.18B | +$46M+$7.77B | +$401M+$10.12B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BKMC IWR | +15.08%+13.69% | +21.00%+19.09% | +17.61%+16.00% | +19.15%+18.21% |
| Max drawdown | BKMC IWR | -5.01%-4.31% | -15.35%-14.39% | -23.71%-21.08% | -25.02%-26.20% |
| Max drawdown duration | BKMC IWR | 12d13d | 46d46d | 284d239d | 827d854d |
BKMC | IWR | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $110.51 | $97.20 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $112.59 | $98.96 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BKMC | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BKMC | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $110.51 | $97.20 |
| 1D performance | -1.85% | -1.78% |
| AuM | $595.04 M | $47.96 B |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.18% |
BKMC | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | BNY Mellon | iShares |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS United States 400 Index | Russell Midcap Index |
| N° of holdings | 349 | 724 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 7, 2020 | July 17, 2001 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BKMC and IWR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, BKMC is up 3.69% year-to-date (YTD), while IWR has returned 2.81%. That puts BKMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BKMC or IWR?
Year-to-date, the BKMC ETF saw -$40M in flows, compared to +$285M for IWR.
Which ETF is more volatile: BKMC or IWR?
Over the past year, BKMC had a volatility of 21%, while IWR experienced 19.09%.
Which ETF is bigger: BKMC or IWR?
As of March 10, 2026, BKMC holds $595.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWR manages $47.96 B.
What sectors do the BKMC and IWR ETFs invest in?
BKMC leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, IWR focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the BKMC ETF and IWR ETF?
BKMC top holdings include US80004C2008, KYG3730V1059 and BLOOM ENERGY CORP. IWR holds in its top three: WESTERN DIGITAL, ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON.
Which ETF is more diversified: BKMC or IWR?
BKMC holds 396 securities with 9.73% of its assets in the top 15. IWR has 808 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.71%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
