Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
BKEMvsGEMETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF (GEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. BKEM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.11%, versus 0.54% for GEM. BKEM is up 7.38% year-to-date (YTD) with +$8M in YTD flows. GEM performs better with 7.57% YTD performance, and +$82M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BKEM and GEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BKEM vs GEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BKEM GEM | -2.62%-2.79% | +9.11%+9.48% | +7.38%+7.57% | +37.13%+37.59% | +66.62%+67.07% | +24.77%+31.12% |
| Flows | BKEM GEM | +$8M+$49M | +$8M+$100M | +$8M+$82M | -$63M+$170M | -$38M+$22M | +$20M-$539M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BKEM GEM | +21.08%+20.74% | +17.41%+17.06% | +14.69%+14.08% | +16.01%+14.83% |
| Max drawdown | BKEM GEM | -9.92%-10.19% | -13.26%-12.81% | -15.84%-14.73% | -35.98%-35.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | BKEM GEM | 12d12d | 52d45d | 245d223d | 1512d1485d |
BKEM | GEM | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:39 PM | $81.97 | $43.33 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $81.37 | $44.56 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BKEM | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BKEM | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.97 | $43.33 |
| 1D performance | +0.74% | -2.76% |
| AuM | $77.29 M | $1.36 B |
| E/R | 0.11% | 0.54% |
BKEM | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | BNY Mellon | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 1517 | 702 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 22, 2020 | September 25, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the BKEM and GEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, BKEM is up 7.38% year-to-date (YTD), while GEM has returned 7.57%. That puts GEM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: BKEM or GEM?
Year-to-date, the BKEM ETF saw +$8M in flows, compared to +$82M for GEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: BKEM or GEM?
Over the past year, BKEM had a volatility of 17.41%, while GEM experienced 17.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: BKEM or GEM?
As of March 10, 2026, BKEM holds $77.29 M in assets under management (AUM), while GEM manages $1.36 B.
What sectors do the BKEM and GEM ETFs invest in?
BKEM leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GEM focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the BKEM ETF and GEM ETF?
BKEM top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and TENCENT HOLDINGS. GEM holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and TENCENT HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: BKEM or GEM?
BKEM holds 1670 securities with 32.8% of its assets in the top 15. GEM has 756 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.82%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
