BINCvsPULSETF Comparison
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) belongs to the Intl Aggregate Bonds segment. PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) is part of the Money Market Bonds segment. BINC's top 3 sector exposures are Sovereign, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, PULS's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. BINC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.52%, versus 0.15% for PULS. BINC is down -0.24% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2.34B in YTD flows. PULS performs better with 3.19% YTD performance, and +$6.50B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BINC and PULS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BINC vs PULS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BINC PULS | -0.04%+0.28% | -1.29%+0.95% | -0.24%+3.19% | +0.40%+4.09% | +21.10%+16.65% | n/a+24.01% |
| Flows | BINC PULS | +$455M+$498M | +$1.13B+$2.11B | +$2.34B+$6.50B | +$4.14B+$6.83B | +$17.28B+$14.32B | -+$17.86B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BINC PULS | +2.22%+0.31% | +2.40%+0.31% | +2.45%+0.33% | n/a+0.39% |
| Max drawdown | BINC PULS | -2.09%-0.06% | -2.40%-0.06% | -2.40%-0.32% | n/a-0.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | BINC PULS | 62d8d | 103d8d | 103d20d | n/a280d |
BINC | PULS | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $50.69 | $49.60 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $50.67 | $49.59 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BINC | PULS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.69 | $49.60 |
| 1D performance | +0.04% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $16.78 B | $19.82 B |
| E/R | 0.52% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
