BILTvsPOWRETF Comparison
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and iShares US Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Utilities, Industrials and Energy. BILT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.4% for POWR. BILT is up 13.12% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. POWR performs better with 17.17% YTD performance, and +$186M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BILT and POWR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BILT vs POWR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BILT POWR | +2.69%+4.68% | +8.15%+12.40% | +13.12%+17.17% | n/a+30.05% | n/a+34.37% | n/a+126.55% |
| Flows | BILT POWR | +$0K+$138M | +$3M+$178M | +$3M+$186M | -+$181M | -+$144M | -+$152M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BILT POWR | +12.03%+17.17% | n/a+16.18% | n/a+18.52% | n/a+22.83% |
| Max drawdown | BILT POWR | -5.84%-3.91% | n/a-5.95% | n/a-22.61% | n/a-24.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | BILT POWR | 38d41d | n/a58d | n/a663d | n/a160d |
BILT | POWR | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 5:45 PM | $27.29 | |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $27.49 | |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
BILT | POWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
BILT | POWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $27.29 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.73% |
| AuM | $25.64 M | $277.12 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.4% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
