BILTvsCSIOETF Comparison
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF (CSIO) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Utilities, Industrials and Energy. BILT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.85% for CSIO. BILT is up 15.07% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. CSIO performs worse with 13.62% YTD performance, and +$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of BILT and CSIO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
BILT vs CSIO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BILT CSIO | +4.14%+3.73% | +9.70%+8.42% | +15.07%+13.62% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | BILT CSIO | +$0K+$11M | +$3M+$15M | +$3M+$15M | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | BILT CSIO | +12.85%+11.46% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | BILT CSIO | -5.84%-5.72% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | BILT CSIO | 38d59d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
BILT | CSIO | |
Last sale | ||
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | ||
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
BILT | CSIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | – |
| 1D performance | – | – |
| AuM | $26.09 M | $36.01 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.85% |
BILT | CSIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Cohen & Steers |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 54 | 24 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 29, 2025 | December 10, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
